Hi Jon,
           When you say 4.0 release, how do u match it with 3.0 minor
releases. The unofficial rule is to not upgrade to prod till .10 is cut.
Also due to heavy investment in testing, I dont think it will take as long
as 3.0 but want to know what is your thinking with this.

Thanks,
Sankalp

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jon Haddad <j...@jonhaddad.com> wrote:

> Sept is a pretty long ways off.  I think the ideal case is we can announce
> 4.0 release at the summit.  I'm not putting this as a "do or die" date, and
> I don't think we need to announce it or make promises.  Sticking with "when
> it's ready" is the right approach, but we need a target, and this is imo a
> good one.
>
> This date also gives us a pretty good runway.  We could cut our first
> alphas in mid June / early July, betas in August and release in Sept.
>  There's a ton of work going into testing 4.0 already.
> Landing CASSANDRA-15066 will put us in a pretty good spot.  We've developed
> tooling at TLP that will make it a lot easier to spin up dev clusters in
> AWS as well as stress test them.  I've written about this a few times in
> the past, and I'll have a few blog posts coming up that will help show this
> in more details.
>
> There's some other quality of life things we should try to hammer out
> before then.  Updating our default JVM settings would be nice, for
> example.  Improving documentation (the data modeling section in
> particular), fixing the dynamic snitch issues [1], and some improvements to
> virtual tables like exposing the sstable metadata [2], and exposing table
> statistics [3] come to mind.  The dynamic snitch improvement will help
> performance in a big way, and the virtual tables will go a long way to
> helping with quality of life.  I showed a few folks virtual tables at the
> Accelerate conference last week and the missing table statistics was a big
> shock.  If we can get them in, it'll be a big help to operators.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14459
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14630
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14572
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:36 PM Nate McCall <zznat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sumanth,
> > Thank you so much for taking the time to put this together.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Nate
> >
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:27 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti <
> > sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have taken an initial stab at documenting release types and exit
> > criteria
> > > in a google doc, to get us started, and to collaborate on.
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit?usp=sharing
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sumanth
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:04 PM Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sankalp,
> > > >
> > > > Great point. This is the page created for testing.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/4.0+Quality%3A+Components+and+Test+Plans
> > > >
> > > > I think we need to define the various release types and the exit
> > criteria
> > > > for each type of release. Anybody want to take a stab at this or
> start
> > a
> > > > thread to discuss it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Dinesh
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On May 23, 2019, at 11:57 AM, sankalp kohli <
> kohlisank...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >    Is there a page where it is written what is expected from an
> > alpha,
> > > > > beta, rc and a 4.0 release?
> > > > > Also how are we coming up with Q4 2019 timeline. Is this for alpha,
> > > beta,
> > > > > rc or 4.0 release?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sankalp
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:27 AM Attila Wind
> <attilaw@swf.technology
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1+1+1 I read a blog post was talking about last sept(?) to freeze
> > > > >> features and start extensive testing. Maybe its really time to hit
> > it!
> > > > :-)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Attila Wind
> > > > >>
> > > > >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/attilaw
> > > > >> Mobile: +36 31 7811355
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2019. 05. 23. 19:30, ajs6f wrote:
> > > > >>> +1 in the fullest degree. A date that needs to be changed is
> still
> > > > >> enormously more attractive than no date at all.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Adam Soroka
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> On May 23, 2019, at 12:01 PM, Sumanth Pasupuleti <
> > > > >> spasupul...@netflix.com.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Having at least a ballpark target on the website will definitely
> > > help.
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >>>> on setting it to Q4 2019 for now.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:52 AM Dinesh Joshi <djo...@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> +1 on setting a date.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Dinesh
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On May 23, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Michael Shuler <
> > > > mich...@pbandjelly.org>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>> We've had 4.0 listed as TBD release date for a very long time.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Yesterday, Alexander Dejanovski got a "when's 4.0 going to
> > > release?"
> > > > >>>>> question after his repair talk and he suggested possibly Q4
> 2019.
> > > > This
> > > > >>>>> morning Nate McCall hinted at possibly being close by ApacheCon
> > Las
> > > > >> Vegas
> > > > >>>>> in September. These got me thinking..
> > > > >>>>>> Think we can we shoot for having a 4.0 alpha/beta/rc ready to
> > > > >>>>> announce/release at ApacheCon? At that time, we'll have been
> > frozen
> > > > >> for 1
> > > > >>>>> year, and I think we can. We'll GA release when it's ready,
> but I
> > > > >> think Q4
> > > > >>>>> could be an realistic target.
> > > > >>>>>> With that said, I'd like to change "TBD" on the downloads page
> > to
> > > > >> "Est.
> > > > >>>>> Q4 2019". We can always push or pull the estimate, but I think
> > it's
> > > > >> time to
> > > > >>>>> have a goal line. This lines up with ApacheCon nicely for a
> > preview
> > > > >> release.
> > > > >>>>>> Any concerns or objections to editing the download page? Have
> > some
> > > > >> other
> > > > >>>>> goal timeframe in mind?
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> Warm regards,
> > > > >>>>>> Michael
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to