If this is your attempt to accept Chris' explanation, even if
you don't agree with it, then you have not quite succeeded.

If instead, this is your attempt to continue to heap fuel on
a fire, and be just as aggressive as you paint others to be, then
you have done quite well.

I don't expect that others will be spending their time replying
to your messages anymore, at least on list.

> On Nov 6, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith <bened...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
> 
> In summary: you claim to be someone with years of experience at the forefront 
> of an organisation that conducts all of its business primarily over email.  
> In that time you have not learned to express yourself over email in a manner 
> that is not incendiary to those reading it, nor offensive to the intended 
> recipient.
> 
> That sounds to me like you are openly disclaiming your suitability for the 
> position of responsibility you currently hold.
> 

Reply via email to