On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: >> I posed a similar question about the JDBC driver in CASSANDRA-2936. >> >> Should these tests be considered functional tests of Cassandra, and >> left be left where they are? I know that was my intention WRT >> test_cql.py (the driver itself has a few tests of its own that do not >> require a server). >> >> I guess I don't have a strong opinion either way, though it seems >> easier to say that Cassandra's tests will require you to have a driver >> installed, versus having to configure the build/test of a driver to >> point to a Cassandra tree. > > I'd lean towards "the tests should be in the client trees." It feels > odd to move the drivers out, but leave their test suites in core. > (Keeping in mind that, as you pointed out, we have two more drivers > almost done.)
Referring to the mail I sent before seeing this.... does that mean option #1 or #3, require a Cassandra tree, or point to running instance? -- Eric Evans Acunu | http://www.acunu.com | @acunu
