On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Eric Evans <eev...@acunu.com> wrote: > I posed a similar question about the JDBC driver in CASSANDRA-2936. > > Should these tests be considered functional tests of Cassandra, and > left be left where they are? I know that was my intention WRT > test_cql.py (the driver itself has a few tests of its own that do not > require a server). > > I guess I don't have a strong opinion either way, though it seems > easier to say that Cassandra's tests will require you to have a driver > installed, versus having to configure the build/test of a driver to > point to a Cassandra tree.
I'd lean towards "the tests should be in the client trees." It feels odd to move the drivers out, but leave their test suites in core. (Keeping in mind that, as you pointed out, we have two more drivers almost done.) -- Jonathan Ellis Project Chair, Apache Cassandra co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support http://www.datastax.com
