As the dude that worked on the 1016 prototype, I agree with this.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Stu Hood <stuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Honestly, I think we should just mark 1016 a dupe and move forward with > 1311: we won't be hurting anyone's feelings, and the implementation from > 1016 is: 1. much, much less complete, 2. abandoned. > > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jeremy Hanna > <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks Maxim - I'll just go ahead and BCC you and Hentschel and move the >> discussion to the dev list. >> >> Based on the comments on 1311 - did you have anything else to add to that - >> could we unify around 1016 or 1311 and work on getting that to a general >> state of acceptance? Were there any that were able to do some work on >> either these days? Or are we not at that point? >> >> On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Maxim Grinev wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Jeremy, thanks for starting the discussion! We don't follow the dev list >> closely so it was a good idea to email it directly. >> > >> > It really seems to be about the same. To unify the discussions, we >> propose to list the features of each solution and compare them feature by >> feature. Here is the feature list for triggers: >> > • Triggers are set on a column family. Triggers are executed for >> each mutation to the column family and parametrized by the mutation. >> > • The mutation, which is the trigger parameter, is the "new" value. >> The trigger cannot see the "old" value. >> > • Triggers are executed asynchronously some time after the write >> which fired it is acknowledged to the client. >> > • Triggers are executed once during normal execution. We guarantee >> "at least once" execution in case of node failures. >> > Cheers, >> > Maxim >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jeremy Hanna >> > <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Hey guys, >> > > >> > > I was just wondering if it would be a good time to unify discussions on >> plugins/triggers/coprocessors? >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1016 >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1311 >> > > >> > > I was going to email the dev list but since I don't know if all of you >> follow the dev list and you guys are the ones that expressed the most >> interest, I thought I would start here. >> > >> > Yeah, they're all tackling basically the same problem. For which we >> > should have a single solution. >> > >> > -ryan >> > >> >> >
