Honestly, I think we should just mark 1016 a dupe and move forward with 1311: we won't be hurting anyone's feelings, and the implementation from 1016 is: 1. much, much less complete, 2. abandoned.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Jeremy Hanna <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks Maxim - I'll just go ahead and BCC you and Hentschel and move the > discussion to the dev list. > > Based on the comments on 1311 - did you have anything else to add to that - > could we unify around 1016 or 1311 and work on getting that to a general > state of acceptance? Were there any that were able to do some work on > either these days? Or are we not at that point? > > On Feb 11, 2011, at 10:36 AM, Maxim Grinev wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Jeremy, thanks for starting the discussion! We don't follow the dev list > closely so it was a good idea to email it directly. > > > > It really seems to be about the same. To unify the discussions, we > propose to list the features of each solution and compare them feature by > feature. Here is the feature list for triggers: > > • Triggers are set on a column family. Triggers are executed for > each mutation to the column family and parametrized by the mutation. > > • The mutation, which is the trigger parameter, is the "new" value. > The trigger cannot see the "old" value. > > • Triggers are executed asynchronously some time after the write > which fired it is acknowledged to the client. > > • Triggers are executed once during normal execution. We guarantee > "at least once" execution in case of node failures. > > Cheers, > > Maxim > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Jeremy Hanna > > <jeremy.hanna1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > I was just wondering if it would be a good time to unify discussions on > plugins/triggers/coprocessors? > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1016 > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1311 > > > > > > I was going to email the dev list but since I don't know if all of you > follow the dev list and you guys are the ones that expressed the most > interest, I thought I would start here. > > > > Yeah, they're all tackling basically the same problem. For which we > > should have a single solution. > > > > -ryan > > > >
