Hi Mihai,
I don't think that's an issue. We're not going to immediately make an RC
available for voting. All of these improvements benefit Avatica and
Calcite and since Avatica isn't worked on as much as Calcite, they are
very much appreciated! Please take your time, there's no need to rush
and we will make the RC available for voting when things are ready :)
Francis
On 11/08/2026 11:31 am, Mihai Budiu wrote:
I apologize for the flurry of Avatica activity, I was actually just trying to
fix a bug, but each thing I try to fix unveils another problem, so I filed a
bunch of issues and I am trying to solve them as well. But maybe it's too much
for the next release?
Mihai
________________________________
From: Mihai Budiu <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 4:31 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.29.0
I will try to submit one more issue and PR about conversions to string, related
to 314, but if I cannot finalize these today, they could probably wait for the
next release.
Mihai
________________________________
From: Francis Chuang <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 4:07 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.29.0
As discussed in the thread for releasing Calcite 1.43.0, it would be a
good opportunity to release Avatica 1.29.0 first, so that Calcite can
receive the dependency upgrade.
I propose we work towards getting the following PRs into the release:
- https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/314
- https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/313
This one hasn't had any activity, but the change seems relatively small:
- https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/310
Would community members be able to help review and provide their
comments on those PRs?
Thanks,
Franc9s
