Hello everyone, sorry for the late reply, my vote is "+0 asolimando (committer/non-binding)".
Making a difference on votes only for PMC vs the rest I think it's important to boost confidence that everyone's voice will be heard, I don't think it would be beneficial to state committership or anything other than the "binding / non-binding" we already use. For what concerns jira id vs github username vs "real" names, I have had some troubles in the past, and the community (luckily!) keeps growing, so it would be nice to have a better way to connect the three easily. Best regards, Alessandro On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 20:13, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Enrico, > > I agree that votes from committers and community members should be taken > seriously (especially when they highlight flaws in the release). > > I also agree that encouraging non-committers to join the community is > important. I would like to see them reviewing PRs and voting on releases. I > think that the vote format is neutral on this. Hopefully non-committers > will see other non-committers voting and be encouraged to participate more. > I intend to include language in the vote email that makes clear that votes > are welcome from everyone. > > Julian > > > > On Sep 14, 2024, at 2:01 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think that adding '(binding)' is enough to count the votes cast by the > > PMC. > > > > I am suggesting this because we should encourage people not being > > committer/PMC member to validate and cast their vote. > > > > IMHO Adding too many labels next to the name and the +1 may bias the > > testing and the validation. Like thinking that the validation from > someone > > is 'better' that the others because it has that label. > > The same is for -1. Any concerns about the goodness of the release should > > have the same weight, even if it is coming from a new user. > > > > It seems to me that this is an healthy community, and we know each other > > (no need to check the Apache id) and there is no need to show the labels > > too much. > > > > My 2 cents, from the peanuts gallery > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il Sab 14 Set 2024, 08:57 Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> ha > > scritto: > > > >> +1, this is good for consistency. > >> > >> On 14/09/2024 7:22 am, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote: > >>> It's easier to understand who is who without checking the index [1] > >>> that I do occasionally. > >>> > >>> +1 zabetak (PMC) > >>> > >>> [1] https://people.apache.org/committer-index.html > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 10:16 PM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> There is a discussion in the Incubator list [1] that proposes a more > >>>> structured format for the line that people write in their email > >>>> message when they vote. > >>>> > >>>> The problem is that some people use multiple names, email accounts, > >>>> github accounts, and that tallying votes requires some effort. > >>>> > >>>> The proposed solution is that people would use a structured line when > >>>> they vote, consisting of their vote (-1, 0, +1), their ASF id if they > >>>> have one, and their role (committer, PMC member, community member). > >>>> For example, my vote would be > >>>> > >>>> +1 jhyde (PMC) > >>>> > >>>> In my opinion, Calcite should adopt this. The email starting a vote > >>>> would recommend that people use that format. Votes would still be > >>>> counted if people use a different format. > >>>> > >>>> What do you think? > >>>> > >>>> Julian > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xkfrnt8f733hhokmh0lvyhsn50x4qfw0 > >> > >> > >
