Hi Bookkeepers, any other comment on this BP ? Only Sijie left his option by now
I am continuing to work at the implementation, but we can't merge it if is there is not enough consensus in the community this is a major change, even if it is 100% backward compatible, but it is tracing the way for further improvements to the project that currently are not possible, like decoupling the concept of "bookieId" from its network location. Please take a look and comment, approve or reject the proposal https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2214 Enrico Il giorno sab 4 gen 2020 alle ore 06:04 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > Thank you for putting all these together. We are interested in this > feature. > > I have made some comments in the proposal. PTAL. > > Thanks, > Sijie > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:25 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > any interest in this proposal ? > > > > It will open up the way to having more information about the services > > exposed by bookies available to the clients and even to the > PlacementPolicy > > (in the future) > > > > I would like to see this kind of support in 4.11 > > > > Enrico > > > > Il giorno ven 13 dic 2019 alle ore 00:30 Enrico Olivelli < > > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > > Hi all, > > > I have created a new BookKeeper Proposal "BP-38 Publish Bookie Service > > > Info on Metadata Service" > > > > > > Proposal: > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2214 > > > > > > Implementation (draft): > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2213 > > > > > > Master ticket: > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/2215 > > > > > > Any feedback is really appreciated, for small comments you can comment > > > directly on PR #2214 (proposal page) other wise we can just follow > this > > > email thread > > > > > > Best regards > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > >
