+1, >From my view, it is better to "have an issue for each PR".
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:28 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some news, I am on hold due to two critical bugs to be fixed. > I will resume as soon as we merge the fixes > Stay tuned > Enrico > > Il dom 14 gen 2018, 15:24 Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > > This is the PR for release notes > > > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/980 > > > > I would like to point out that now that we do not have an issue for each > > PR it is really messy to create release notes, or at least it is not > > possible to have a simple link to a list of the things that have been > done, > > because issues and pull requests overlaps. > > I can live with this anyway. > > > > Enrico > > > > > > 2018-01-09 2:35 GMT+01:00 Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Enrico, > >> > >> I cherry-picked a few changes from master to branch-4.6. > >> > >> The important fix is the index persistence manager fix that Ivan did, > and > >> other fixes that Sam fixed. > >> > >> I already update the release labels for the cherry-picked changes. > However > >> please also take a look before you cut the 4.6.1 release. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sijie > >> > >> On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 11:27 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Just worth point out, even licensing change is ready, you should stick > >> to > >> > only release server package. Because 4.6.1 is a bug fix release for > >> 4.6.0, > >> > which should be only limited to bug fixes. > >> > > >> > Sijie > >> > > >> > On Jan 7, 2018 2:35 AM, "Enrico Olivelli" <eolive...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi BookKeepers, > >> >> I would like to cut a release from 4.6 branch. > >> >> I need the bookkeeper-server-shaded artifact, this is my motivation. > >> >> I will start the formal process in the middle of the next week if no > >> one > >> >> has objections. > >> >> Please tag with 4.6.1 label any issue/pr which you want to include in > >> 4.6 > >> >> branch before the release. > >> >> I will take care of having all of them in. > >> >> About the licensing stuff...I am going to relase the same set of > >> artifacts > >> >> as 4.6.0 because we are not ready to distribute the big package with > >> all > >> >> the dependencies > >> >> > >> >> Cheers > >> >> Enrico > >> >> -- > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >
