+1 (binding)

verified signatures, build, and standalone,

-Dave

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> 1) Notices and licenses look good to me (some minor issues, but not
> enough to hold up release)
> 2) md5, sha1, sig look good
> 3) findbugs, rat and tests pass
> 4) Jepsen test passes (exercise both client and bin package)
> Env: Debian 9
>
> Good work Jia!
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > 1) notices, licenses look good to me (I can be biased since I made that
> > change)
> > 2) md5, signature look good
> > 3) binary package looks good (run standalone)
> > 4) source package looks good (compile, test and run standalone)
> > 5) artifactory, tag look good
> >
> > Environment: OSX
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Il mar 19 dic 2017, 02:13 Jia Zhai <zhai...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> >>
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
> >> > 4.6.0, as follows:
> >> > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> >> > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
> >> >
> >>
> >> +1
> >> run tests from src package
> >> Checked signatures and checksums
> >> Run tests of my downstream projects
> >> Performed basic shell classes commands and run a single machine ensemble
> >>
> >> Thank you Jia
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > This new release candidate mainly fixed the license issue, also
> removed
> >> > bookkeeper-all package for it contains unclear license.
> >> >
> >> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
> includes:
> >> > * Release notes [1]
> >> > * The official Apache source and binary distributions to be deployed
> >> > to dist.apache.org [2]
> >> > * All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [3]
> >> > * Source code tag "release-4.6.0" [4] with sha
> 0d6c21e0a88749c428749841db
> >> > 59cf53195e556c
> >> >
> >> > BookKeeper's KEYS file contains PGP keys we used to sign this
> >> > release:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Please download these packages and review this release candidate:
> >> >
> >> > - Review release notes
> >> > - Download the source package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow
> >> the
> >> > instructions to build and run the bookkeeper service.
> >> > - Download the binary package (verify md5, shasum, and asc) and follow
> >> the
> >> > instructions to run the bookkeeper service.
> >> > - Review maven repo, release tag, licenses, and any other things you
> >> think
> >> > it is important to a release.
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by majority
> >> > approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jia Zhai
> >> >
> >> > [1] *https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759
> >> > <https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/759>*
> >> > [2] *
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> bookkeeper-4.6.0-rc2/
> >> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/
> bookkeeper-4.6.0-rc2/
> >> >*
> >> > [3] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgap
> >> > achebookkeeper-1023/
> >> > [4] https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.6.0
> >> >
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>
>

Reply via email to