[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15997858#comment-15997858
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008:
--------------------------------------------
Github user eolivelli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116
@kishorekasi it is great to see all tests now passing !
@kishorekasi did you take a look to latest @merlimat commit on this issue ?
@kishorekasi @sijie @revans2 Now that all the tests are passing I think we
should restore the refactor of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-930, the change is quite
simple, it is just a better code, see the PR
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/49 and the discussion about the
refactor
> Move to netty4
> --------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-1008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: bookkeeper-client, bookkeeper-server
> Affects Versions: 4.5.0
> Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
> Assignee: Robert Joseph Evans
>
> As part of the Yahoo push back and in general we would like to move to netty
> 4, preferably netty 4.1.x for the client and server communication.
> This lays the ground work for zero copy, or very nearly zero copy handling on
> the server side.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
