+1 (binding)

Valentyn and Cham, are you ready to confirm with an explicit +1 vote?


On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:06 PM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:

> OK, I am going to give it a little more time to consider. If I understand
> correctly, the problem already existed in 2.61.0 and our options are: (1)
> leave it in 2.62.0 or (2) upgrade enough dependencies that it might be high
> risk.
>
> If that is correct and there is no more information that comes up, I am
> going to choose (1).
>
> Kenn
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 11:55 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev via dev <
> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for confirming, then I am fine to call it a known issue in
>> 2.62.0,  2.61.0 and fix for 2.63.0 and I retract my -1 vote.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:49 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev <
>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, this seems to be happening for numpy 2.1.3. as well so likely the
>>> issue existed before the current release.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 6:50 AM XQ Hu via dev <dev@beam.apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I tested this with my mackbook and with a clean venv and pip install
>>>> "apache-beam[gcp]==2.61.0". numpy==2.1.3 is installed.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 5:25 AM Valentyn Tymofieiev via dev <
>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Chamikara Jayalath <chamik...@google.com> Does this bug also happen
>>>>> in 2.61.0 ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am seeing that the numpy 2.x upgrade was first introduced earlier in
>>>>> 2.61.0:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/6129c9a56d52ebb060417cb397e0764cdd8791bc
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case the regression would be a preexisting known issue and
>>>>> according to our release process it doesn't have to block the release, and
>>>>> I would retract my -1 vote as per:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Is this a regression from a previous release? (If no, fix could
>>>>>    go to a newer version.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However we also had:
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/commit/fd17dcea9cae8a444fcd1fc9708dffdd2e33cda0
>>>>> , and it is possible that this commit has introduced the regression that
>>>>> you observe, then it would be better to revert
>>>>> fd17dcea9cae8a444fcd1fc9708dffdd2e33cda0  commit on the release branch and
>>>>> make RC2.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also saw that we reverted a wrong commit on the release branch,
>>>>> sending: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33638
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 8:07 PM Valentyn Tymofieiev <
>>>>> valen...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Cham for flagging this. It sounds like an inconvenience at
>>>>>> minimum, I vote -1 and suggest to rollback the numpy upgrade on the 
>>>>>> release
>>>>>> branch. Alternative: we upgrade numpy in the SDK containers but that 
>>>>>> leaves
>>>>>> us with releasing a configuration that had less time to be tested.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 6:55 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev <
>>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW my vote is -0 since I'm unsure of the true impact of this :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 9:34 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>>>>> chamik...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems like we updated the "numpy" version for this release [1] but
>>>>>>>> we did not update SDK harness containers [2].
>>>>>>>> One of the jobs I ran (Java multi-lang that uses Python Dataframe)
>>>>>>>> failed due to this with the following error. I suspect pure Python
>>>>>>>> pipelines may also fail due to similar errors though unless users pin 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> numpy version during job submission.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy._core.numeric'
>>>>>>>> ```
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> May be we can address this by updating the
>>>>>>>> "base_image_requirements.txt" files and re-generating the Python SDK
>>>>>>>> harness containers ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Cham
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33325
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/77f38cd74735cc732c99d0752ee10c3585a3b0c7/sdks/python/container/py311/base_image_requirements.txt#L106
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 7:43 PM Yi Hu via dev <dev@beam.apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> tested Dataflow Template integration tests with Java 11 and 17:
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/DataflowTemplates/pull/2133
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 1:22 PM Danny McCormick via dev <
>>>>>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (binding) - tested some example ML pipelines on the local
>>>>>>>>>> (interactive) and Dataflow runners.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Danny
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 12:53 PM XQ Hu via dev <
>>>>>>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) - tested this with a simple Dataflow ML
>>>>>>>>>>> pipeline:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/google/dataflow-ml-starter/actions/runs/12752033114/job/35540477801
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:28 AM Jack McCluskey via dev <
>>>>>>>>>>> dev@beam.apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) - downloaded python artifacts, ran direct and
>>>>>>>>>>>> dataflow wordcount pipleines
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:54 AM Kenneth Knowles <
>>>>>>>>>>>> k...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 2.62.0, as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release candidate, and vote +1 if no issues are found. For
>>>>>>>>>>>>> guidelines on how to try the release in your projects, check out 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> our RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing guide at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/contributor-docs/rc-testing-guide.md
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only PMC member votes will count towards the final vote, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes from all community members are encouraged and helpful for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> finding
>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - GitHub Release notes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://github.com/apache/beam/milestone/26
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The official Apache source release:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.62.0/ which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    is signed with the key with fingerprint D20316F712213422, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> found in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/beam/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - All artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Repository:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebeam-1395/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - source code tag "v2.62.0-RC1" (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/v2.62.0-RC1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - website pull request listing the release and blog post:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33567
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - website pull request publishing the API reference
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    manual: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/675
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Python artifacts are deployed along with the source
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    release to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/beam/2.62.0/ and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    PyPI https://pypi.org/project/apache-beam/2.62.0rc1/.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Go artifacts and documentation are available at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/apache/beam/sdks/v2@v2.62.0-RC1/go/pkg/beam
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Validation sheet with a tab for 2.62.0 release to help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    with validation:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qk-N5vjXvbcEk68GjbkSZTR8AGqyNUM-oLFo_ZXBpJw/edit?gid=1493515573#gid=1493515573
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Docker images published to Docker Hub:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://hub.docker.com/search?q=apache%2Fbeam&type=image
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Pull request to run tests against release branch:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/33424
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - Github Release pre-release page:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    https://github.com/apache/beam/releases/tag/v2.62.0-RC1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> majority approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to