On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 10:39 PM Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote:
>
> Right now I’m 0.
>
> I’ve not run across this before, I’m not sure if it’s an issue for the 
> release.  See gpg output below about the key not being certified.  This is 
> the reason my vote is 0 at the moment.
> gpg --verify $FILE.asc $FILE
> gpg: Signature made Thu Aug 24 07:11:17 2023 CDT
> gpg:                using RSA key 16D7A0B27D5ADD52BD57932971751399FB39CB84
> gpg: Good signature from "Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com>" [unknown]
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!

don't worry, it's ok.
>
> I checked:
> - Downloaded; checked hashes/signatures; checked LICENSE, NOTICE, 
> DISCLAIMER-WIP; compiled and ran tests on OSX, OpenJDK 17, Maven 3.8.4.
> - Rat check showed 1441 unapproved licenses.  However, since we are a WIP and 
> I think this issue is known, so we are good.
> - I tried to run the example from the tar.gz binary, but the website seems to 
> refer to the repo - not a release. As an example, the openStreet Map example 
> wouldn’t work with one of our binary releases. This isn’t a blocker by any 
> means, just a developer experience idea that I thought about while checking 
> the release.
>
> $ cd examples/openstreetmap
> $ baremaps workflow execute --file workflow.json
>
> Because the “examples” folder wasn’t in the binary release I wasn’t sure how 
> to run the example.
>
> - Josh
>
> > On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:20 PM, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you Josh and Julian. There is no hurry, especially if we can increase 
> > the duration of the vote.
> >
> > As we all have busy schedule, I will probably extend future release votes 
> > to one week in the future.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Bertil
> >
> >> On 28 Aug 2023, at 19:07, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> What Josh said. I’ll review & vote today. Apologies.
> >>
> >>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 7:42 AM, Josh Fischer <j...@joshfischer.io> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I apologize for my absence.  I will spend some time looking at it in the 
> >>> next 24 hours.
> >>>
> >>> This is one of the fun and challenging parts of working through the 
> >>> incubator. I’ve had votes go over two weeks before.  Our best bet is to 
> >>> get as many binding (preferably 3) votes on the dev@baremaps list.  It’s 
> >>> often harder to get votes on general@a.o <mailto:general@a.o>.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Let’s wait a few more days to get binding votes. Open-source moves at the 
> >>> speed of open-source, fun!
> >>>
> >>>> On Aug 28, 2023, at 9:10 AM, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello Everyone,
> >>>>
> >>>> We don’t have enough vote for publishing our release. Can we extend the 
> >>>> deadline or should we start a new vote?
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that some projects, such as Apache Pekko, ask the incubator 
> >>>> mailing-list to vote for their releases. Should we try to do the same?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Bertil
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 24 Aug 2023, at 14:52, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello Everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Following our online release party (thank you Leonard and Perdjesk), we 
> >>>>> have created a build for Apache Baremaps (incubating) 0.7.2, release 
> >>>>> candidate 1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can read the release notes here:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/releases/tag/v0.7.2-rc1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The commit to be voted upon:
> >>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/tree/v0.7.2-rc1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Its hash is e917d5b02fdb64c3f715afd449bb1fe9ca5c2f58.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Its tag is v0.7.2-rc1.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/baremaps/0.7.2-rc1/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >>>>> d910b50ebed4200d0ef6f0c1ee3e4db0cd95ea005fe54fca66dfc4ec4dca73e96edc8913654c85c73539d6a9d27481157fea9f456a9f3aa451c178a811a89ea0
> >>>>>  ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >>>>> fda00056b9785bbbb7f966e92cf7e118071f5b6d44f9652176a4626cec38c5b0738933b24e23efef423eafba2111bc6a22e6f00a67fda2f10b0011f9c22f3208
> >>>>>  ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/bchapuis.asc
> >>>>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/baremaps/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The README file for the src distribution contains instructions for 
> >>>>> building and testing the release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Baremaps 0.7.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at 
> >>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Baremaps <version>
> >>>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is my vote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +1 (binding): I checked the signatures and the checksums; I built the 
> >>>>> project from its sources; and checked the binary distribution.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bertil Chapuis
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org
> >>
> >
>


-- 
Best wishes!
CalvinKirs

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@baremaps.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@baremaps.apache.org

Reply via email to