Hello Everyone, We don’t have enough vote for publishing our release. Can we extend the deadline or should we start a new vote?
I see that some projects, such as Apache Pekko, ask the incubator mailing-list to vote for their releases. Should we try to do the same? Best regards, Bertil > On 24 Aug 2023, at 14:52, Bertil Chapuis <bchap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > Following our online release party (thank you Leonard and Perdjesk), we have > created a build for Apache Baremaps (incubating) 0.7.2, release candidate 1. > > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. > > You can read the release notes here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/releases/tag/v0.7.2-rc1 > > The commit to be voted upon: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-baremaps/tree/v0.7.2-rc1 > > Its hash is e917d5b02fdb64c3f715afd449bb1fe9ca5c2f58. > > Its tag is v0.7.2-rc1. > > The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/baremaps/0.7.2-rc1/ > > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows: > d910b50ebed4200d0ef6f0c1ee3e4db0cd95ea005fe54fca66dfc4ec4dca73e96edc8913654c85c73539d6a9d27481157fea9f456a9f3aa451c178a811a89ea0 > ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-src.tar.gz > fda00056b9785bbbb7f966e92cf7e118071f5b6d44f9652176a4626cec38c5b0738933b24e23efef423eafba2111bc6a22e6f00a67fda2f10b0011f9c22f3208 > ./apache-baremaps-0.7.2-incubating-bin.tar.gz > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/bchapuis.asc > https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/baremaps/KEYS > > The README file for the src distribution contains instructions for building > and testing the release. > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Baremaps 0.7.2. > > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least > three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Baremaps <version> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > Here is my vote: > > +1 (binding): I checked the signatures and the checksums; I built the project > from its sources; and checked the binary distribution. > > Best regards, > > Bertil Chapuis
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
