Hello again, one more status update!  I've been away from the computer
for the last week.  Ideally, I was really hoping to get the 1.11.1 RC1
ready for review before leaving, but quite a few unexpected things
have been consuming my time (not to mention more travelling coming
up).

I'd like to offer my sincere apologies to those who have been waiting
for a committer to review and merge their contributions.  Personally,
I haven't been looking at anything else, unless it's specifically
tagged for the 1.11.1 release, and it's been weighing on me.

At this point, it looks like we have a couple of alternatives:

1. Prepare a 1.11.1 RC1 as a candidate as a branch AS IS, with (again)
apologies for those who have outstanding, unreviewed PRs, pushing the
remaining JIRA tagged for 1.11.1 to a later release, or

2. Continue as we are to make sure that everyone's work is included
and the release is as complete as possible, even if it means delaying
a couple more weeks.

Regardless, I'd love to have the discussion on our efficiency on
getting contributions merged... ideally after we get this one big task
finished :D

If there's no strong objection, I can prepare a 1.11.1 RC1 tomorrow.
If we decide to continue adding work to the branch, we can always
reject that release candidate!

All my best, Ryan


On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 7:15 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!  Just a quick status update -- a LOT of great PRs have
> been merged for 1.11.1, but it's dragging on.  There's a couple of
> unreviewed or unmerged PRs that are pretty good matches for this
> release[1].
>
> I have some unexpected travel coming up (tomorrow), but I still want
> to get an RC out ASAP.  Thanks very much for the people who have been
> diligently reviewing and my apologies to the contributors who have
> been kept waiting!
>
> Once this release is out, we can probably start to discuss ways to
> improve the process for the next time!
>
> All my best regards, Ryan
>
> [1]: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AVRO%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.11.1%20AND%20status%20!%3D%20Resolved
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:48 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > Here's one way people can help get this release out -- I've published
> > the website _almost_ as is for the next release at
> > https://avro-site.skraba.com
> >
> > Of course, this is NOT the final destination, and in the future,
> > hopefully we'll have a better place to review changes before
> > publishing.
> >
> > Can you give it a look and see if there is anything that would BLOCK
> > replacing avro.apache.org with this website?  If there is, please
> > don't hesitate to raise a JIRA subtask at AVRO-2175.
> >
> > Of course, if you find problems and improvements that don't block the
> > release, don't hesitate to raise a JIRA anyway (under AVRO-3264, for
> > example, for main page improvements).
> >
> > All my best, Ryan
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:11 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everyone!
> > >
> > > I've been trying to wrap up the release -- it's taken a lot longer
> > > than I anticipated, my apologies for those who are waiting.  I've
> > > managed to merge a lot of PRs, but here's the list of outstanding
> > > tasks:
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3539  Publish version-specific docs for each release
> > >
> > > This is part of the newly refactored website.  Essentially, I've been
> > > testing the build to see how it would work for the next releases
> > > (1.11.2, 1.12.0, etc).  There are currently some minor issues that I'm
> > > working out.
> > >
> > > I'm not too worried that the website be perfect, once it's in the git
> > > repo we can probably start seeing contributions and improvements
> > > rapidly!
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3531 PR#1719 GenericDatumReader in multithread lead to infinite
> > > loop cause misused of IdentityHashMap
> > >
> > > The PR is in good shape, but is super difficult to test.  I'm running
> > > through it.
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3473 PR#1624 Automatically register Conversion<T> classes
> > >
> > > Next on my list!
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3377 PR#1527 Deserialization of record of mangled Java class
> > > throws ClassCastException
> > >
> > > I haven't had a chance to look at this yet.
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3266 PR#1431 / PR#1618 Output stream incompatible with
> > > MagicS3GuardCommitter
> > >
> > > There are two PRs, both look fine but which one we pick depends on
> > > whether we drop Hadoop 2.  I'd love to hear your opinion!
> > >
> > > # AVRO-3219 PR#1348 Not support for nullable enum type fields
> > >
> > > We need a C# expert to take a look at this one.
> > >
> > > # AVRO-2872 PR#1097 'conversions' array is not populated for Avro
> > > Union Logicaltype fields
> > >
> > > I have to admit, this one is baffling me, and I haven't been able to
> > > figure out what the consequence is of NOT merging it.
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who has been reviewing, committing and
> > > cherrypicking so far!  I'm going to continue, but my goal is to have a
> > > hosted website before the weekend for people to pick at, and to create
> > > the RC early next week.  During this time, I'll keep in better touch
> > > here.
> > >
> > > All my best, Ryan
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 8:42 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Ryan,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 8:27 PM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > OK!  I'm back on this subject and interested in getting this done!  I
> > > > > was blocked for a while on
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-3454, but I think I've
> > > > > found a workaround.
> > > > >
> > > > > For all of the interest in shadowing the release, we'll try to find a
> > > > > common time.  Don't worry too much about missing out if we can't
> > > > > arrange a common time -- this could be something that we do for all
> > > > > releases, for as long as there are contributors that find it
> > > > > worthwhile!
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the process is not significantly different than what we've
> > > > > documented, but it's especially useful to have extra eyes to point out
> > > > > what we no longer notice.
> > > > >
> > > > > My apologies for letting this release drag on for quite a while
> > > > > (nearly 3 months) -- just a reminder if you've seen something checked
> > > > > into master that is a good candidate for 1.11.1, don't hesitate to
> > > > > bring it up here!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Almost everything in Rust, C# and Python is committed in both master and
> > > > branch-1.11.
> > > > There are open PRs for the Java library which wait for someone more
> > > > knowledgeable in that area (you :-) ) to review and merge.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > All my best, Ryan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 11:13 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind
> > > > > <os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For me, after 19:00 or Mon,Tue,Thu,Fri between 7:30-16:00 (all UTC)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Op wo 11 mei 2022 10:00 schreef Martin Grigorov 
> > > > > > <mgrigo...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Me too!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now I guess it will be harder to find a timeslot where all of us 
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > it :-)
> > > > > > > I could find time during the working hours (5:00-14:00 UTC) and 
> > > > > > > after
> > > > > 18:00
> > > > > > > UTC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:16 AM Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <
> > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd also like to help/shadow, as the release contains a feature 
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > > help me a lot. Also, the sooner we have a release,  the sooner 
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > new
> > > > > > > > ANTLR grammar for the 1.12 release can be tested with more than 
> > > > > > > > just
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > test cases.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kind regards,
> > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <os...@westravanholthe.nl>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Op wo 11 mei 2022 05:20 schreef Jack Klamer 
> > > > > > > > <jfkla...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I would love to help/shadow, because I believe I am the most
> > > > > likely to
> > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > broken something and I have added complexity to the rust 
> > > > > > > > > packaging
> > > > > > > > process
> > > > > > > > > that is not yet well scripted/automated.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Jack
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 10:55 AM Ryan Skraba <r...@skraba.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello everyone!  My apologies for being absent lately. I've 
> > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > > > > professional and personal travel and I didn't have the 
> > > > > > > > > > spare time
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > I thought I might!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'd love to continue with the 1.11.1 release -- it looks 
> > > > > > > > > > like
> > > > > there's
> > > > > > > > > > less than a dozen issues still tagged in JIRA (some of them
> > > > > mine...)
> > > > > > > > > > The website is in pretty good shape, for example.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Would anyone like to shadow the"release process live this 
> > > > > > > > > > time?
> > > > > We
> > > > > > > > > > could probably do this with a slack call and a shared 
> > > > > > > > > > screen.
> > > > > It's
> > > > > > > > > > not significantly difficult (less than 30 minutes) but it 
> > > > > > > > > > takes
> > > > > place
> > > > > > > > > > in two parts --> building the artifacts before calling a 
> > > > > > > > > > vote and
> > > > > > > > > > publishing the artifacts after the vote passes.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'm currently catching up on the mailing lists, but we could
> > > > > probably
> > > > > > > > > > do this in the next two weeks.  Even if the release
> > > > > documentation is
> > > > > > > > > > pretty good, it would be a good way to share how it 
> > > > > > > > > > currently
> > > > > works.
> > > > > > > > > > My only constraint is that it would have to be scheduled 
> > > > > > > > > > after
> > > > > 17:00
> > > > > > > > > > UTC or on the weekend!
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > All my best, Ryan
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 10:34 AM Martin Grigorov <
> > > > > > > mgrigo...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to Jack Klamer there are no known issues in the 
> > > > > > > > > > > Rust
> > > > > SDK!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > In the coming days I will add "Getting started" guide for 
> > > > > > > > > > > Rust
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > > > > > website!
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Martin
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 12:46 AM Jack Klamer <
> > > > > jfkla...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > That PR has been merged thanks to the work of Martin! I
> > > > > believe
> > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > be more work to do in this vein but that PR covers some 
> > > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > main
> > > > > > > > > > > > workflows that are affected.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 1:40 PM Ryan Skraba 
> > > > > > > > > > > > <r...@skraba.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Jack!  How long do you you'll need?  There's a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > lot of
> > > > > > > open
> > > > > > > > > PRs
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that we can evaluate in the meantime, so if it's 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > worth it
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > delay
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > release a couple of weeks, then I have no objection!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ideally, I'd like to see more frequent releases, so 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > it's
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a big deal when someone's PR doesn't make it in for 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > review
> > > > > > > > reasons
> > > > > > > > > :/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, there's still some things to do in 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > JIRA
> > > > > > > set
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.11.1, I'll send another message if we start getting
> > > > > closer.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All my best and thanks for your work!  Ryan
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:22 PM Jack Klamer <
> > > > > > > jfkla...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would personally love to get in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/avro/pull/1602 as it 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > contains
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > bug
> > > > > > > > > fix
> > > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > decently likely scenario. However it may take 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > longer to
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > than
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the desired release time here, but I’ll do what I 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > can to
> > > > > meet
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > deadline.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jack
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:11 AM Oscar Westra van 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Holthe
> > > > > -
> > > > > > > > Kind <
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a minor release
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From what I can see, there's indeed enough for a 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > new
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Especially
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the C# and Rust improvements merit a release.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oscar
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 19:30, Ryan Skraba <
> > > > > r...@skraba.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's about 150 issues that have been 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > resolved[1]
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > cherry
> > > > > > > > > > > > picked
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into branch-1.11 since the last release 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (including
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > > bumps
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > us off of the log4j CVE radar, even if we aren't
> > > > > > > vulnerable
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > is).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've been pretty rigorous with cherry-picking 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > back
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > branch-1.11
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > so it would probably be a pretty easy release 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > around!
> > > > > > > > > > > > What
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > do you think about starting the process?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There's still a bit of work that I'd like to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > website
> > > > > > > > > > > > and a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > few open issues[2] targeted to 1.11.1, and many 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > open
> > > > > PRs
> > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > might
> > > > > > > > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > candidates.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think?  Is it the right time to 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > think
> > > > > about
> > > > > > > it?
> > > > > > > > > Is
> > > > > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything blocking a new minor release?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have an open PR or favourite JIRA that 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hasn't
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > > > > addressed,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't hesitate to bring it up, or update the
> > > > > fixVersion.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All my best, Ryan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%3DAVRO%20AND%20fixVersion%3D1.11.1%20AND%20status%3DResolved
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2]:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%3DAVRO%20AND%20fixVersion%3D1.11.1%20AND%20status!%3D%20Resolved
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ✉️ Oscar Westra van Holthe - Kind <
> > > > > > > os...@westravanholthe.nl>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >

Reply via email to