Aha- that's awesome. Cool, I'll move to that instead (and remove our TODO for you :)
Thanks John! On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Sirois <john.sir...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just setup a bintray account and a little publish script so we have a > more stable serving system for these things. > I need to doc this a bit for pants maintainers and users alike, but > thought you might like to try it out. > Artifacts are here: http://dl.bintray.com/pantsbuild/bin > Publish script is here: > https://github.com/pantsbuild/binaries/blob/gh-pages/sync-bintray.sh > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Ayers <zun...@squareup.com> wrote: > >> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal >> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others. >> >> pants_support_baseurls = [ >> 'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support', >> 'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support', >> ] >> >> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping >> binaries in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could >> handle a lot of traffic. >> >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <yasumo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get >>> much clarity on the filed issue on github >>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>. >>> >>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/> >>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that >>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future >>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store >>> on you guys if that's not its purpose. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Joe >>> >> >> > >
