Thanks for the insight! This is going to be for the external Apache codebase, so we're okay with using https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support if you're also using it as a fallback.
Thanks! On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Eric Ayers <zun...@squareup.com> wrote: > At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal > site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others. > > pants_support_baseurls = [ > 'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support', > 'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support', > ] > > We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping binaries > in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could handle a > lot of traffic. > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <yasumo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, >> >> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get >> much clarity on the filed issue on github >> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>. >> >> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/> >> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that >> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future >> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store >> on you guys if that's not its purpose. >> >> Thanks! >> Joe >> > >
