> On Dec. 14, 2013, 1:30 a.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > I would much rather see further investment in local runs through vagrant. > > Have you considered focusing there instead? > > Suman Karumuri wrote: > Yes, I have considered it and found vagrant to be too slow for iterative > edit-build-run cycle. I prefer a local script like this for local testing. > Kevin also suggested that I not go the vagrant route for the same reason. > > Zameer Manji wrote: > Have we considered improving vagrant so it is suitable for an iterative > edit-build-run cycle? That is fairly normal amongst other projects that use > Vagrant.
Once I found vagrant to be a slower option, I have not looked into it further for the following reasons: a) Such an option doesn't provide any more value than a simple shell script like this at least for UI testing. b) Even with vagrant in place, it will be nice to have some way to run to run a local scheduler without depending on vagrant or other things like this. c) It is simpler to attach a debugger to a running process when the process is running on a local host than when it is running inside a VM. d) When things don't work, vagrant is another layer to peel through to understand whatever is going on. e) This script follows the same dev workflow as before and I see no reason to change it. f) Making vagrant better for this use case, seemed like embarking on another yak shaving trip. In short, keeping it simple. I also felt that a simple script like this makes the ramp up time for new devs lower. - Suman ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/#review30394 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 14, 2013, 1:08 a.m., Suman Karumuri wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 14, 2013, 1:08 a.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney, Maxim Khutornenko, and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Adding a script to run an isolated scheduler. > > > Diffs > ----- > > examples/scheduler/scheduler-isolated.sh PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > gradle clean build installApp && ./examples/scheduler/scheduler-isolated.sh > works. > > > Thanks, > > Suman Karumuri > >
