> On Dec. 13, 2013, 5:30 p.m., Bill Farner wrote: > > I would much rather see further investment in local runs through vagrant. > > Have you considered focusing there instead? > > Suman Karumuri wrote: > Yes, I have considered it and found vagrant to be too slow for iterative > edit-build-run cycle. I prefer a local script like this for local testing. > Kevin also suggested that I not go the vagrant route for the same reason.
Have we considered improving vagrant so it is suitable for an iterative edit-build-run cycle? That is fairly normal amongst other projects that use Vagrant. - Zameer ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/#review30394 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 13, 2013, 5:08 p.m., Suman Karumuri wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 13, 2013, 5:08 p.m.) > > > Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney, Maxim Khutornenko, and Bill Farner. > > > Repository: aurora > > > Description > ------- > > Adding a script to run an isolated scheduler. > > > Diffs > ----- > > examples/scheduler/scheduler-isolated.sh PRE-CREATION > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16267/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > gradle clean build installApp && ./examples/scheduler/scheduler-isolated.sh > works. > > > Thanks, > > Suman Karumuri > >
