> On Dec. 13, 2013, 1:35 a.m., Bill Farner wrote:
> > src/main/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java, line 
> > 146
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/16232/diff/1/?file=397101#file397101line146>
> >
> >     There's a bit of a feature gap here — if the task _is_ assigned, the 
> > reservation should be cleared so we can promptly schedule others.  It may 
> > be tempting to call the O(n) invalidateTask(), but i suggest adding the 
> > O(1) invalidateSlave().
> >     
> >     Please write a failing test for this behavior, then fix.
> 
> Zameer Manji wrote:
>     Pushing this to the next diff.
> 
> Zameer Manji wrote:
>     Actually not doing this just yet. This complicates the code because now 
> it removes the reservation either when the taskState changes or when we 
> assign the task. I strongly prefer keeping it simple and letting reservation 
> removal occur via pubsub.

Oh, duh — braindead response on my part.  I forgot that the assignment would 
induce a state change.  This LGTM.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16232/#review30317
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 14, 2013, 12:16 a.m., Zameer Manji wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16232/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 14, 2013, 12:16 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Aurora, Kevin Sweeney, Maxim Khutornenko, and Bill Farner.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AURORA-11
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-11
> 
> 
> Repository: aurora
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a reservation system the preemption flow.
> 
> The reservation associates a slave id with a task id for a fixed duration. If 
> the task attempts to schedule itself during that time period and an offer is 
> available from that slave then it will be scheduled. If another task attempts 
> to schedule itself then it will not use the reserved offer.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/main/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/AsyncModule.java 
> db07841543e554e269f6fe7b36d7f7232af21140 
>   src/main/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/Preemptor.java 
> e5aeb8321e22c51eb3a5dad3d3dd1e26b7121b7d 
>   src/main/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskGroups.java 
> f95f719c5a444b0f8faa4330852e251dd5de528e 
>   src/main/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskScheduler.java 
> fbd82ff70235294cfd27c242f141a585d6bb2396 
>   src/test/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerImplTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   src/test/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/async/TaskSchedulerTest.java 
> a747f2b1ecbad7263931aeec3b12711096d2469d 
>   src/test/java/com/twitter/aurora/scheduler/state/PubsubTestUtil.java 
> f9d7fb64728008d0ea6eb424283b58e956e1d50a 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16232/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> ./gradlew clean build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Zameer Manji
> 
>

Reply via email to