I think deprecating is a good idea. I haven't had time to try and maintain it and I'm doubtful the original author is following any of the communications. If I get around to picking up [1], then I can see about "reviving" skyhook, but in that case the component will look very different anyways. [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/40583
Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 01:13, Raúl Cumplido <rau...@apache.org> wrote: I am in favour of deprecating it. We already discussed deprecating it in February when the job was failing on this PR comment section [1]. [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/45538 El lun, 5 may 2025 a las 10:05, Antoine Pitrou (<anto...@python.org>) escribió: > > Hello, > > "Skyhook" is a little-known C++ component that interfaces Arrow with the > Ceph distributed filesystem. It received it last non-trivial change in > 2022: > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/546c3771a209cbcac5e03cf26e07bcd8c9601d5a > > You won't find much documentation for it except for an example and some > API docs: > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/search.html?q=skyhook > > Most Google search results point to the 2022 paper that presents the > original work: > https://www.google.com/search?q=%22arrow%22+%22skyhook%22 > > A C++ code search only brings Arrow C++ itself (there are unrelated C++ > projects that use the word "skyhook"): > https://grep.app/search?f.lang.pattern=c%2B%2B&words=true&q=skyhook > > Should we deprecate the Skyhook component and remove it in a release or > two? > > Regards > > Antoine. > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
