Hi,

The vote carries with:

6 +1 (binding):
  Sutou Kouhei, David Li, Wes McKinney, Antoine Pitrou,
  Raúl Cumplido, Neal Richardson
2 +1 (non-binding):
  Jacob Wujciak, Gang Wu
0  0:
0 -1:

I'll list tasks for this and share them here as the first
step. Please help us by writing, reviewing, testing and so
on if you're interested in this.

Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <20241122.103131.536851636597346186....@clear-code.com>
  "[VOTE] Split Java release process" on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:31:31 +0900 (JST),
  Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I would like to propose splitting Java release process.
> 
> Motivation:
> 
> * We want to reduce needless major releases because major
>   releases require users' change
> * We want to reduce apache/arrow's release cost
> 
> Approach:
> 
> 1. Extract java/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-java like
>    apache/arrow-go
>    * Filter java/ related commits from apache/arrow and create
>      apache/arrow-java with them like we did for apache/arrow-go
>    * Remove java/ related codes from apache/arrow
> 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does:
>    https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/main/.github/workflows/test.yml
> 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-go
>    * We may try sharing release related tools by creating a
>      new apache/arrow-SOMETHING (apache/arrow-release?)
>      repository
> 
> New release process:
> 
> * apache/arrow-java will be released separated from
>   apache/arrow
> * Gang or David will be a release manager of apache/arrow-java
>   * Other committers and PMC members including me help a
>     release manager
> * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months
>   but apache/arrow-java will use more longer major release
>   cycle
>   * apache/arrow-java will use more minor/patch releases than
>     apache/arrow
> 
> 
> See also the discussion of this:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/b99wp2f3rjhy09sx7jqvrfqjkqn9lnyy
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> kou

Reply via email to