+1 (binding)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2024, at 3:04 PM, Joris Van den Bossche wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 at 09:56, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Le 26/08/2024 à 04:37, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to propose splitting Go release process.
>> >
>> > Motivation:
>> >
>> > * We want to reduce needless major releases because major
>> >    releases require users' change
>> >
>> > Approach:
>> >
>> > 1. Extract go/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-go like
>> >     apache/arrow-rs
>> >     * Filter go/ related commits from apache/arrow and create
>> >       apache/arrow-go with them like we did for apache/arrow-rs
>> >     * Remove go/ related codes from apache/arrow
>> > 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-rs does:
>> >     
>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/.github/workflows/integration.yml
>> > 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-julia,
>> >     apache/arrow-adbc and/or apache/arrow-flight-sql-postgresql
>> >
>> > New release process:
>> >
>> > * apache/arrow-go will be released separated from
>> >    apache/arrow
>> > * Matt or Joel will be a release manager of apache/arrow-go
>> > * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months
>> >    but apache/arrow-go will use more longer major release
>> >    cycle
>> >    * apache/arrow-go will use more minor/patch releases than
>> >      apache/arrow
>> >
>> > Impact on users:
>> >
>> > * Users need to update their import paths to
>> >    github.com/apache/arrow-go/v${VERSION}/arrow from
>> >    github.com/apache/arrow/go/v${VERSION}/arrow
>> >    * Currently, users need to update their import paths per
>> >      3-4 months because apache/arrow uses a new major version
>> >      per 3-4 months. So this will not a big impact for the
>> >      current users.
>> >
>> >
>> > See also the discussion of this:
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/fstyfvzczntt9mpnd4f0b39lzb8cxlyf
>> >
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
>> > [ ] +0
>> > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,

Reply via email to