+1 (binding)

On Mon, Aug 26, 2024, at 11:49, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> In <20240826.113702.1496714896073155680....@clear-code.com>
>   "[VOTE] Split Go release process" on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 11:37:02 +0900 (JST),
>   Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I would like to propose splitting Go release process.
>> 
>> Motivation:
>> 
>> * We want to reduce needless major releases because major
>>   releases require users' change
>> 
>> Approach:
>> 
>> 1. Extract go/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-go like
>>    apache/arrow-rs
>>    * Filter go/ related commits from apache/arrow and create
>>      apache/arrow-go with them like we did for apache/arrow-rs
>>    * Remove go/ related codes from apache/arrow
>> 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-rs does:
>>    
>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/.github/workflows/integration.yml
>> 3. Prepare release script based on apache/arrow-julia,
>>    apache/arrow-adbc and/or apache/arrow-flight-sql-postgresql
>> 
>> New release process:
>> 
>> * apache/arrow-go will be released separated from
>>   apache/arrow
>> * Matt or Joel will be a release manager of apache/arrow-go
>> * apache/arrow releases a new major version per 3-4 months
>>   but apache/arrow-go will use more longer major release
>>   cycle
>>   * apache/arrow-go will use more minor/patch releases than
>>     apache/arrow
>> 
>> Impact on users:
>> 
>> * Users need to update their import paths to
>>   github.com/apache/arrow-go/v${VERSION}/arrow from
>>   github.com/apache/arrow/go/v${VERSION}/arrow
>>   * Currently, users need to update their import paths per
>>     3-4 months because apache/arrow uses a new major version
>>     per 3-4 months. So this will not a big impact for the
>>     current users.
>> 
>> 
>> See also the discussion of this:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/fstyfvzczntt9mpnd4f0b39lzb8cxlyf
>> 
>> 
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -- 
>> kou

Reply via email to