IMO, we'd better start a separate discussion to dev@parquet ML
as the original discussion contains a lot of stuff and I didn't see
enough Parquet PMCs to reply to this topic.

Best,
Gang

On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 7:01 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Perhaps we need a separate vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the
> action.
>
> Agreed. Did we discuss this enough to call for a vote yet?
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:23 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Rok for the update!
> >
> > Yes, the copied issues look good to me. Perhaps we need a separate
> > vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the action.
> >
> > Best,
> > Gamg
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:40 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I have set up a script for the parquet-cpp migration (and also for
> > > migration of other parquet tickets in case we decide to go ahead).
> > > I would like to run the parquet-cpp migration sometime next week.
> > >
> > > To test the process I've created the following test repos and copied
> > issues
> > > there. Please take a look and let me know if something could be
> improved.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-cpp/issues
> > > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-java/issues
> > > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-format/issues
> > > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-site/issues
> > > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-testing/issues
> > >
> > > Rok
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:04 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Would we also want to add issue templates to encourage some
> structure?
> > > See
> > > > [1] for inspiration.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 3:50 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Thanks Dewey!
> > > >>
> > > >> Please note that parquet-site has already enabled GitHub issues. So
> I
> > > >> created following PRs:
> > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255
> > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362
> > > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/50
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >> Gang
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:11 AM Dewey Dunnington
> > > >> <de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > > INFRA tickets are required before migration.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Perhaps this is different for existing repositories, but just a
> note
> > > >> > that it may also be possible by editing .asf.yaml (e.g. [1])
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [1]
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/blob/81711045e8bb4ded1cb3b5a6fa354b35f18aa4e7/.asf.yaml#L24-L25
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:39 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Just want to mention that these apache/parquet-* Github
> > repositories
> > > >> > > have not yet enabled issues and INFRA tickets are required
> before
> > > >> > > migration.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Best,
> > > >> > > Gang
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 1:55 AM Micah Kornfield <
> > > >> emkornfi...@gmail.com>
> > > >> > > wrote:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > SGTM +1
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:50 AM Rok Mihevc <
> > rok.mih...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM Fokko Driesprong <
> > > >> fo...@apache.org>
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Hey Rok,
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Thanks for bringing this up. I'm also very much in favor
> of
> > > >> Github.
> > > >> > > > Once
> > > >> > > > > > we've migrated cpp, I think migrating the other
> repositories
> > > is
> > > >> a
> > > >> > great
> > > >> > > > > > idea. Let me know if I can help!
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Perfect! A question I think we want to answer is where to
> move
> > > >> which
> > > >> > > > > issues. My mapping by component would be:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-avro           --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cascading  --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cli               --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cpp            --> github/arrow
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-format        --> github//parquet-format
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-hadoop      --> github//parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-mr              --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-pig             --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-protobuf     --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-site             --> github/parquet-site
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-testing        --> github/parquet-testing
> > > >> > > > > jira/parquet-thrift            --> github/parquet-java
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Would this be ok for everyone?
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Rok
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to