> Perhaps we need a separate vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the
action.

Agreed. Did we discuss this enough to call for a vote yet?

On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:23 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Rok for the update!
>
> Yes, the copied issues look good to me. Perhaps we need a separate
> vote for non-parquet-cpp repos before the action.
>
> Best,
> Gamg
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:40 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I have set up a script for the parquet-cpp migration (and also for
> > migration of other parquet tickets in case we decide to go ahead).
> > I would like to run the parquet-cpp migration sometime next week.
> >
> > To test the process I've created the following test repos and copied
> issues
> > there. Please take a look and let me know if something could be improved.
> >
> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-cpp/issues
> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-java/issues
> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-format/issues
> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-site/issues
> > https://github.com/rok/test-parquet-testing/issues
> >
> > Rok
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:04 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Would we also want to add issue templates to encourage some structure?
> > See
> > > [1] for inspiration.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 3:50 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Thanks Dewey!
> > >>
> > >> Please note that parquet-site has already enabled GitHub issues. So I
> > >> created following PRs:
> > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/255
> > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1362
> > >> - https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/50
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >> Gang
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 10:11 AM Dewey Dunnington
> > >> <de...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > > INFRA tickets are required before migration.
> > >> >
> > >> > Perhaps this is different for existing repositories, but just a note
> > >> > that it may also be possible by editing .asf.yaml (e.g. [1])
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/blob/81711045e8bb4ded1cb3b5a6fa354b35f18aa4e7/.asf.yaml#L24-L25
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:39 PM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Just want to mention that these apache/parquet-* Github
> repositories
> > >> > > have not yet enabled issues and INFRA tickets are required before
> > >> > > migration.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best,
> > >> > > Gang
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 1:55 AM Micah Kornfield <
> > >> emkornfi...@gmail.com>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > SGTM +1
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:50 AM Rok Mihevc <
> rok.mih...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 4:39 PM Fokko Driesprong <
> > >> fo...@apache.org>
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hey Rok,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Thanks for bringing this up. I'm also very much in favor of
> > >> Github.
> > >> > > > Once
> > >> > > > > > we've migrated cpp, I think migrating the other repositories
> > is
> > >> a
> > >> > great
> > >> > > > > > idea. Let me know if I can help!
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Perfect! A question I think we want to answer is where to move
> > >> which
> > >> > > > > issues. My mapping by component would be:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-avro           --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cascading  --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cli               --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-cpp            --> github/arrow
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-format        --> github//parquet-format
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-hadoop      --> github//parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-mr              --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-pig             --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-protobuf     --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-site             --> github/parquet-site
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-testing        --> github/parquet-testing
> > >> > > > > jira/parquet-thrift            --> github/parquet-java
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Would this be ok for everyone?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Rok
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to