Hi Kou, Totally makes sense. Great idea!
Thank you, Alva Bandy > On Oct 10, 2023, at 10:26 PM, Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm OK with this if we can keep following the Apache Way: > > * https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/ > * https://theapacheway.com/ > > > Can we discuss how to develop with separated arrow-swift > repository after we re-read the above documentations? > > FYI: Here are discussions for arrow-rs and arrow-julia: > > * [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process > https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3dr1vlt9115r3x9m7bprmo4zpnog483 > * [DISCUSS][Julia] How to restart at apache/arrow-julia? > https://lists.apache.org/thread/9hy387r8hvfrtnqdvgyszj3mf53mdr96 > * Future of the Julia arrow implementation > https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/284 > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In > <mn2pr02mb5789a434a52b040c204d363eb2...@mn2pr02mb5789.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> > "[DISCUSS][Swift] repo for swift similar to arrow-rs" on Mon, 9 Oct 2023 > 20:26:53 +0000, > Alva Bandy <aba...@live.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to request a repo for Arrow Swift (similar to arrow-rs). Swift >> arrow is currently fully Swift and doesn't leverage the C++ libraries. One >> of the goals of Arrow Swift was to provide a fully Swift impl and splitting >> them now would help ensure that Swift Arrow stays on this path. >> >> Also, the Swift Package Manager uses a git repo url to pull down a package. >> This can lead to a large download since the entire arrow repo will be pulled >> down just to include Arrow Swift. It would be great to make this change >> before registering Swift Arrow with a Swift registry (such as Swift Package >> Registry). >> >> Please let me know if this is possible and if so, what would be the process >> going forward. >> >> Thank you, >> Alva Bandy
