Hi, I'm OK with this if we can keep following the Apache Way:
* https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/ * https://theapacheway.com/ Can we discuss how to develop with separated arrow-swift repository after we re-read the above documentations? FYI: Here are discussions for arrow-rs and arrow-julia: * [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process https://lists.apache.org/thread/w3dr1vlt9115r3x9m7bprmo4zpnog483 * [DISCUSS][Julia] How to restart at apache/arrow-julia? https://lists.apache.org/thread/9hy387r8hvfrtnqdvgyszj3mf53mdr96 * Future of the Julia arrow implementation https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/284 Thanks, -- kou In <mn2pr02mb5789a434a52b040c204d363eb2...@mn2pr02mb5789.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> "[DISCUSS][Swift] repo for swift similar to arrow-rs" on Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:26:53 +0000, Alva Bandy <aba...@live.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to request a repo for Arrow Swift (similar to arrow-rs). Swift > arrow is currently fully Swift and doesn't leverage the C++ libraries. One of > the goals of Arrow Swift was to provide a fully Swift impl and splitting them > now would help ensure that Swift Arrow stays on this path. > > Also, the Swift Package Manager uses a git repo url to pull down a package. > This can lead to a large download since the entire arrow repo will be pulled > down just to include Arrow Swift. It would be great to make this change > before registering Swift Arrow with a Swift registry (such as Swift Package > Registry). > > Please let me know if this is possible and if so, what would be the process > going forward. > > Thank you, > Alva Bandy
