The vote passes with 5 binding votes. Thanks all! As stated before, I'll hold off on merging until after ADBC (packages) 0.6.0 is released, which I will do as soon as Arrow (Go) 13.0.0 is released.
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, at 12:16, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > Le 14/08/2023 à 19:39, David Li a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly >> decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various >> missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position >> ADBC to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more >> metadata, like table/column statistics). >> >> For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.) >> >> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with >> the linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard. >> >> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a >> vote to release any packages; the first package release to support version >> 1.1.0 of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the >> linked PR until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.) >> >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification >> [ ] 0 >> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because... >> >> Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will >> Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress >> PRs. >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 >> [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo >> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971 >> >> Thank you, >> David
