The final branch is ready for review: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971
I'll start the vote later this week. On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, at 10:04, David Li wrote: > A late update here: I've merged most of the proposed changes and > implementations for ADBC 1.1.0 into a branch [1]. The remaining work is > to finish up the C++ implementation and Python bindings, after which > I'll propose a vote, hopefully in the next 2 weeks. Any feedback on the > API proposal so far would be much appreciated (diff against main at > [2]; focus on adbc.h, go/adbc/adbc.go, and java/adbc-core). > > I don't expect 1.1.0 to include C# or Rust, but I think this is OK as > they are still being brought up regardless. > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/tree/spec-1.1.0 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/compare/main...spec-1.1.0 > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023, at 14:00, David Li wrote: >> Two updates here: >> >> - We've merged the C# and Rust PRs. They were not in the recent >> release, but are in the source tree, and I hope we can continue >> iterating on them. (A few contributors have been actively working on >> C#.) >> - A second PR [1] has been filed that proposes new APIs for ADBC around >> metadata and statistics. Any comments there would be much appreciated! >> (Only C/C++ is sketched, they will be ported to Go/Java once there's a >> rough consensus.) >> >> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/765 >> >> On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 14:50, David Li wrote: >>> We originally agreed to treat the ADBC APIs as a specification, >>> requiring votes for updates to the specification. >>> >>> To that end, this PR [1] proposes new APIs for ADBC to cover various >>> gaps identified, to clarify some language, and to make things >>> consistent with the Flight SQL proposals discussed earlier [2]. In >>> addition, assuming the ArrowDeviceArray proposal [3] is accepted the PR >>> will be updated again to support the new types. >>> >>> The definitions are backwards compatible, with some messiness in C/C++ >>> around one struct. The plan is to merge the new APIs into a branch, >>> then merge implementations into that branch, before bringing things >>> back for a final review/vote. >>> >>> Any feedback would be welcome. >>> >>> Incidentally: proposals for C# [4] and Rust [5] now exist. I'd like to >>> treat both of them as 'experimental', in the sense that we will merge >>> them without formal vote for now while we implement the APIs, so we can >>> work out any revisions before the formal vote. >>> >>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/692 >>> [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp >>> [3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/o2hsw7o1gm3qgw5z51rmz6zqxh0p7bvk >>> [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/697 >>> [5]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/478 >>> >>> -David
