Two updates here: - We've merged the C# and Rust PRs. They were not in the recent release, but are in the source tree, and I hope we can continue iterating on them. (A few contributors have been actively working on C#.) - A second PR [1] has been filed that proposes new APIs for ADBC around metadata and statistics. Any comments there would be much appreciated! (Only C/C++ is sketched, they will be ported to Go/Java once there's a rough consensus.)
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/765 On Thu, May 25, 2023, at 14:50, David Li wrote: > We originally agreed to treat the ADBC APIs as a specification, > requiring votes for updates to the specification. > > To that end, this PR [1] proposes new APIs for ADBC to cover various > gaps identified, to clarify some language, and to make things > consistent with the Flight SQL proposals discussed earlier [2]. In > addition, assuming the ArrowDeviceArray proposal [3] is accepted the PR > will be updated again to support the new types. > > The definitions are backwards compatible, with some messiness in C/C++ > around one struct. The plan is to merge the new APIs into a branch, > then merge implementations into that branch, before bringing things > back for a final review/vote. > > Any feedback would be welcome. > > Incidentally: proposals for C# [4] and Rust [5] now exist. I'd like to > treat both of them as 'experimental', in the sense that we will merge > them without formal vote for now while we implement the APIs, so we can > work out any revisions before the formal vote. > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/692 > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp > [3]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/o2hsw7o1gm3qgw5z51rmz6zqxh0p7bvk > [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/697 > [5]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/478 > > -David
