Hi, The vote carries with 4 +1 binding votes, 1 +1 non-binding vote and no -1 votes.
I'll merge https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35178 . Thanks, -- kou In <20230504.162543.1402874314941615676....@clear-code.com> "[VOTE][Format][Flight] Ordered data support" on Thu, 04 May 2023 16:25:43 +0900 (JST), Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose ordered data support for Flight RPC. > > See the following pull request and discussion for details: > > * GH-34852: [C++][Go][Java][FlightRPC] Add support for ordered data > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35178 > > Preview: http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35178/format/Flight.html > > * [DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Ordered data support > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0q1s84p17rtdz3q81wvylckob1hsx83z > > This is based on one of the following proposals: > > [DISCUSS] Flight RPC/Flight SQL/ADBC enhancements > https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp > > Google Docs: (Arrow ML) Arrow Flight RPC/Flight SQL Proposals > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhPyPZSOo2iy0LqIJVUs9KWPyFULVFJXTILDfkadx2g/edit#heading=h.h2ein4otvhtq > > Summary: > > * Before: > There is no ordering defined on endpoints or the data > within. > > After: > FlightInfo.ordered is added. If FlightInfo.ordered is > true, this signals there is some order between data from > different endpoints. > > * Motivation: We can optimize a sorted results case by > FlightInfo.ordered. A client needs to sort by itself even > when a Flight RPC system returns sorted results without > FlightInfo.ordered. Because a client can't know whether > results are sorted or not. > > * This proposal does NOT break a backward > compatibility. Because clients can ignore > FlightInfo.ordered. > > * The pull request includes reference implementations for > C++, Go and Java. > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > > Thanks, > -- > kou
