+1 Thanks Kou!
On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 6:57 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Kou! > > On Thu, May 4, 2023, at 05:09, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:25 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose ordered data support for Flight RPC. > >> > >> See the following pull request and discussion for details: > >> > >> * GH-34852: [C++][Go][Java][FlightRPC] Add support for ordered data > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/35178 > >> > >> Preview: > http://crossbow.voltrondata.com/pr_docs/35178/format/Flight.html > >> > >> * [DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Ordered data support > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0q1s84p17rtdz3q81wvylckob1hsx83z > >> > >> This is based on one of the following proposals: > >> > >> [DISCUSS] Flight RPC/Flight SQL/ADBC enhancements > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp > >> > >> Google Docs: (Arrow ML) Arrow Flight RPC/Flight SQL Proposals > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhPyPZSOo2iy0LqIJVUs9KWPyFULVFJXTILDfkadx2g/edit#heading=h.h2ein4otvhtq > >> > >> Summary: > >> > >> * Before: > >> There is no ordering defined on endpoints or the data > >> within. > >> > >> After: > >> FlightInfo.ordered is added. If FlightInfo.ordered is > >> true, this signals there is some order between data from > >> different endpoints. > >> > >> * Motivation: We can optimize a sorted results case by > >> FlightInfo.ordered. A client needs to sort by itself even > >> when a Flight RPC system returns sorted results without > >> FlightInfo.ordered. Because a client can't know whether > >> results are sorted or not. > >> > >> * This proposal does NOT break a backward > >> compatibility. Because clients can ignore > >> FlightInfo.ordered. > >> > >> * The pull request includes reference implementations for > >> C++, Go and Java. > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> kou >
