OK. I'll cut RC2 with the fix.

In <CALm9rPT8dtsrmKHc9vdMK-8dA0xZJxwshaD8UDLiaW_4F=2...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Re: [VOTE][Julia] Release Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 RC1" on Sat, 15 Apr 2023 
06:46:17 -0400,
  Ben Baumgold <b...@baumgold.com> wrote:

> With PR#430 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> merged I can
> now give my +1 vote for this release.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 8:24 PM Ben Baumgold <b...@baumgold.com> wrote:
> 
>> I made Issue #49 <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/429> for
>> this bug and created PR#430
>> <https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/430> as a proposed solution.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 7:57 PM Ben Baumgold <baumg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I saw the same issue on my M1 Mac with Julia v1.8.5.  All tests pass
>>> successfully on my x86_64 GNU/Linux box with Julia v1.8.5.
>>>
>>> On 2023/04/12 17:26:20 Eric Hanson wrote:
>>> > I saw the same issue, on Julia 1.8.5, macOS m1. I tried Rosetta as well
>>> and got a different error:
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/issues/425
>>> >
>>> > On 2023/04/12 07:10:14 David Li wrote:
>>> > > I was able to reproduce it just now, with the same error. If there's
>>> a patch I can apply or a flag I can set, I'm happy to give it a run in the
>>> AM.
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 10:02, Jacob Quinn wrote:
>>> > > > Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running
>>> tests.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in
>>> [this
>>> > > > commit](
>>> > > >
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958
>>> ),
>>> > > > but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong
>>> > > > enough or
>>> > > > something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a
>>> debug
>>> > > > build for you and have it report some data around our check for
>>> this.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -Jacob
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > >> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> The gist seems to be:
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> ```
>>> > > >>       nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer
>>> 0x293389438
>>> > > >> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
>>> > > >>       Stacktrace:
>>> > > >>         [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
>>> > > >>           @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
>>> > > >>         [2] unsafe_wrap
>>> > > >>           @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
>>> > > >>         [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
>>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
>>> > > >> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
>>> > > >>           @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
>>> > > >>         [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field,
>>> #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
>>> > > >> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
>>> > > >> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64,
>>> convert::Bool)
>>> > > >>           @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
>>> > > >>         [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
>>> > > >> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
>>> > > >> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
>>> > > >>           @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
>>> > > >>         [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64,
>>> Int64})
>>> > > >>           @ Arrow
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
>>> > > >>         [7] iterate
>>> > > >>           @
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
>>> > > >> [inlined]
>>> > > >>         [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
>>> > > >>           @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
>>> > > >>         [9] _collect
>>> > > >>           @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
>>> > > >>        [10] collect
>>> > > >>           @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
>>> > > >>        [11] macro expansion
>>> > > >>           @
>>> > > >>
>>> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
>>> > > >> [inlined]
>>> > > >>        [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
>>> > > >> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64,
>>> Arrow.DictEncoding},
>>> > > >> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
>>> > > >>           @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
>>> > > >> ```
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> [1]:
>>> https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>>> > > >>
>>> > > >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>>> > > >> > Hi,
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
>>> > > >> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > This release candidate is based on commit:
>>> > > >> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit
>>> tests,
>>> > > >> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release
>>> candidate.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
>>> > > >> > [ ] +0
>>> > > >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >> > [1]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
>>> > > >> > [2]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
>>> > > >> > [3]:
>>> > > >> >
>>> > > >>
>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>>> > > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>

Reply via email to