Hi, I did the followings because they require PMC:
- Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System - Upload source The current status: - [done] Update the released milestone Date and set to "Closed" on GitHub - [] Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA - [] Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version - [done] Merge changes on release branch to maintenance branch for patch releases - [done] Add the new release to the Apache Reporter System - [done] Upload source - [] Upload binaries - [] Update website - [] Update Homebrew packages - [] Update MSYS2 package - [] Upload RubyGems - [] Upload JavaScript packages - [] Upload C# packages - [] Update conda recipes - [] Upload wheels/sdist to pypi - [] Publish Maven artifacts - [] Update R packages - [] Update vcpkg port - [] Update Conan recipe - [] Bump versions - [] Update tags for Go modules - [] Update docs - [] Update version in Apache Arrow Cookbook - [] Announce the new release - [] Publish release blog posts - [] Remove old artifacts Thanks, -- kou In <cad1rbrrhuz5r_gvcixcqcp_w652lavjvnvx+lmwfkucy8+x...@mail.gmail.com> "[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:17:35 +0100, Raúl Cumplido <raulcumpl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The result of the vote is successful with 3 +1 binding votes, 3 +1 > non-binding votes and no -1 votes. > > I will start with the post release tasks [1] and Kou has volunteered to > help me with the tasks that require PMC. > > Can someone with PARQUET permissions help with the following tasks: > - Make the CPP PARQUET related version as "RELEASED" on JIRA > - Start the new version on JIRA for the related CPP PARQUET version > > Thanks, > Raúl > > [1] > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/dev/developers/release.html#post-release-tasks > > El dom, 22 ene 2023 a las 18:36, Dewey Dunnington > (<de...@voltrondata.com.invalid>) escribió: > >> Just a note that I wasn't able to produce an error building Arrow C++ using >> clang-dev [1]. That isn't to say one doesn't still exist (I will test more >> thoroughly in the coming days), but it does suggest that it's something we >> can/should handle at the packaging stage if it does pop up (rather than >> block a release). >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33819 >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 8:44 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote. >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This >> > is >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.) >> > >> > We don't find any blocker for 11.0.0 for now. How about >> > releasing 11.0.0 with RC0 and releasing 11.0.1 with clang 16 >> > support? (The latter option.) >> > >> > >> > We may want to add a CI job with llvm-toolchain-snapshot >> > https://apt.llvm.org/focal/pool/main/l/llvm-toolchain-snapshot/ >> > . We will be able to avoid this situation (Apache Arrow C++ >> > doesn't work with unreleased LLVM) with it in future. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > -- >> > kou >> > >> > In <caocv4hjj_jzv4fwupdm9dbyjifvgsv0s96p+vwgsf17efmm...@mail.gmail.com> >> > "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 11.0.0 - RC0" on Fri, 20 Jan 2023 >> > 10:50:29 -0500, >> > Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > I received an email this morning from the CRAN maintainers about a C++ >> > > build failure on clang 16. Although clang 16 is not scheduled for >> release >> > > until March, CRAN wants to ensure that all packages build successfully >> on >> > > it when it becomes available, so they've given us an ultimatum to fix >> the >> > > issue or face removal. >> > > >> > > Whether or not we agree with this policy (not relevant for us to >> discuss >> > > here), we have two options: >> > > >> > > * Fix now, include in an 11.0.0 RC1, start a new vote. >> > > * Proceed with RC0, fix for 12.0.0 (and 11.0.1, should it happen), and >> > > cherry-pick the fix into the bundle we upload to CRAN for 11.0.0. (This >> > is >> > > something we do regularly, not a crazy exception.) >> > > >> > > https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/bdr/clang16/README.txt suggests that >> the >> > fix >> > > could be as easy as upgrading our bundled boost version, but we won't >> > know >> > > for sure until we reproduce it. We suppress libarrow build output on >> > CRAN, >> > > so unfortunately there are no logs from their report. >> > > >> > > I'm fine with either option. clang 16 will be out before we do the >> 12.0.0 >> > > release, and it would be nice if we compiled successfully on it, but I >> > > don't have strong feelings as to whether that is "nice to have" enough >> to >> > > force an RC1. >> > > >> > > Neal >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:39 AM Raúl Cumplido <raulcumpl...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > >> +1 (non binding) >> > >> >> > >> I have tested both SOURCES and BINARIES successfully with: >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > 11.0.0 >> > >> 0 >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_WHEELS=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > 11.0.0 >> > >> 0 >> > >> TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARIES=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > >> 11.0.0 0 >> > >> with: >> > >> * Python 3.10.6 >> > >> * gcc (Ubuntu 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.3.0 >> > >> * NVIDIA CUDA cuda_11.5.r11.5/compiler.30672275_0 >> > >> * openjdk 17.0.5 2022-10-18 >> > >> * ruby 3.0.2p107 (2021-07-07 revision 0db68f0233) [x86_64-linux-gnu] >> > >> * dotnet 6.0.202 >> > >> * Ubuntu 22.04 LTS >> > >> >> > >> From my understanding the identified issues are not release blockers, >> > >> that's why I am voting +1: >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33783 >> > >> We are compatible with dotnet 7.0.x but we are only compatible testing >> > with >> > >> 6.0.x. More info on the issue and PR associated. >> > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786 >> > >> XSIMD on Ubuntu, I have tested the proposed workaround and built and >> run >> > >> verification successfully. >> > >> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/15054 >> > >> aws-sdk-cpp leak and flaky test crash. More discussions on the issue >> but >> > >> doesn't seem to be a blocker. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Raúl >> > >> >> > >> El vie, 20 ene 2023 a las 6:06, Weston Pace (<weston.p...@gmail.com>) >> > >> escribió: >> > >> >> > >> > I've got a fix[1] in for the verification script for C#. There are >> > >> > more details in the issue and the PR but IMO we are compatible with >> > >> > C#7 and C#6, we simply were not testing it correctly. I have run >> the >> > >> > tests locally with both 6.0 and 7.0 sdks and they passed. >> > >> > >> > >> > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33799 >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 5:52 PM Jacob Wujciak >> > >> > <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I have investigated the issue of the system xsimd causing an error >> > [1] >> > >> > and >> > >> > > I don't think this should be a blocker as it can be circumvented >> by >> > >> > > explicitly setting xsimd_SOURCE=BUNDLED. >> > >> > > I don't think the incompatibility with C# 7 should be a blocker >> > either, >> > >> > it >> > >> > > should probably be documented that we are not compatible with that >> > >> > version >> > >> > > somewhere (if that is not already the case) but otherwise it is >> > fine, >> > >> > e.g. >> > >> > > JS is incompatible with nodejs 18. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > On a relatively fresh Ubuntu 22.04 without conda I had to apt >> > install >> > >> > some >> > >> > > > libs (default-jdk >> > >> > > > maven libjemalloc-dev libgirepository1.0-dev libsqlite3-dev) and >> > this >> > >> > > > passed fine: >> > >> > > > TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 >> > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > +1 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Rok >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:05 PM Raúl Cumplido < >> > >> raulcumpl...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Antoine, I can finally reproduce it. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Jacob Wujciak for the pointer on the log, I couldn't >> find >> > >> it: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > -- Building xsimd from source >> > >> > > > > CMake Error at cmake_modules/ThirdpartyToolchain.cmake:2295 >> > >> > > > (add_library): >> > >> > > > > add_library cannot create imported target "xsimd" because >> > another >> > >> > > > target >> > >> > > > > with the same name already exists. >> > >> > > > > Call Stack (most recent call first): >> > >> > > > > CMakeLists.txt:498 (include) >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I can reproduce it if I install `apt install libxsimd-dev`. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > I've opened an issue to track it here: >> > >> > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/33786 >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks! >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 13:27, Antoine Pitrou (< >> > >> anto...@python.org >> > >> > >) >> > >> > > > > escribió: >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > I used the following command: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > LANG=C TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1 >> > >> > > > > > ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 11.0.0 0 >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Here is the full output: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > https://gist.github.com/pitrou/3fdca2460fa71bba731b0706703b70b2 >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Regards >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Antoine. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Le 19/01/2023 à 13:07, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : >> > >> > > > > > > El jue, 19 ene 2023 a las 12:21, Antoine Pitrou (< >> > >> > anto...@python.org >> > >> > > > >) >> > >> > > > > > > escribió: >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> On Ubuntu 22.04, C++ source verification *without conda* >> > fails >> > >> > > > because >> > >> > > > > > >> it is attempting to find various libraries (re2, LLVM, >> > >> > rapidjson, >> > >> > > > > etc.). >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> Antoine, could you help me understand what the issue is >> > here >> > >> or >> > >> > how >> > >> > > > to >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce it? I can't reproduce it. >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > I don't use conda, I use Ubuntu 22.04 and apart from being >> > able >> > >> > to >> > >> > > > > > > reproduce the C# issue if I use .NET 7.0.102 the rest >> looks >> > >> good >> > >> > on >> > >> > > > my >> > >> > > > > > side >> > >> > > > > > > (when using old C#): >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > $ TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 >> > >> > > > dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > >> > > > > > > 11.0.0 0 >> > >> > > > > > > ... >> > >> > > > > > > Release candidate 11.0.0-RC0 looks good! >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> C++ source verification succeeds with conda. >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> Le 19/01/2023 à 11:06, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : >> > >> > > > > > >>> Hi, >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> I would like to propose the following release candidate >> > (RC0) >> > >> > of >> > >> > > > > Apache >> > >> > > > > > >>> Arrow version 11.0.0. This is a release consisting of >> 423 >> > >> > > > > > >>> resolved GitHub issues[1]. >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> This release candidate is based on commit: >> > >> > > > > > >>> f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d [2] >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The source release rc0 is hosted at [3]. >> > >> > > > > > >>> The binary artifacts are hosted at >> > >> [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. >> > >> > > > > > >>> The changelog is located at [12]. >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run >> the >> > >> unit >> > >> > > > tests, >> > >> > > > > > >>> and vote on the release. See [13] for how to validate a >> > >> release >> > >> > > > > > >> candidate. >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> See also a verification result on GitHub pull request >> > [14]. >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow 11.0.0 >> > because... >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >>> [1]: >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/milestone/1?closed=1 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [2]: >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d >> > >> > > > > > >>> [3]: >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-11.0.0-rc0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [4]: >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/almalinux-rc/ >> > >> > > > > > >>> [5]: >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/amazon-linux-rc/ >> > >> > > > > > >>> [6]: >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/centos-rc/ >> > >> > > > > > >>> [7]: >> https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/debian-rc/ >> > >> > > > > > >>> [8]: >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/java-rc/11.0.0-rc0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [9]: >> > >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/nuget-rc/11.0.0-rc0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [10]: >> > >> > > > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/python-rc/11.0.0-rc0 >> > >> > > > > > >>> [11]: >> > https://apache.jfrog.io/artifactory/arrow/ubuntu-rc/ >> > >> > > > > > >>> [12]: >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/f10f5cfd1376fb0e602334588b3f3624d41dee7d/CHANGELOG.md >> > >> > > > > > >>> [13]: >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/How+to+Verify+Release+Candidates >> > >> > > > > > >>> [14]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33751 >> > >> > > > > > >>> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >>
