I'm quite skeptical about this. My experience is that many people have a
very subjective idea of what is critical or not, and the categorization
ends up not very informative.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 13/01/2023 à 23:53, Will Jones a écrit :
Following up: I have created a PR adding the definition [1]. While
writing this, I ended up feeling that it made sense to keep separate labels
for "Critical Fix" and "Priority: Critical".
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/33660
On Sat, Jan 7, 2023 at 2:54 AM Rok Mihevc <rok.mih...@gmail.com> wrote:
I replied in the GitHub thread [1], but will say that I am +1 on
Priority:
Blocker and Priority: Critical. Though I wonder if we could use "Critical
Fix" in place of "Priority: Critical"? Unless we have two different
definitions. As is, the names are similar enough that it could be
confusing. Perhaps I can draft a full definition of "Critical Fix", and
then we can discuss based on that? (I assume at the very least that
Priority Critical never refers to features, right?)
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/14593
Agreed on the Priority: Blocker and Priority: Critical.
A shared definition would indeed be useful! I think best place to put it
would be in the issue creation interface [2].
[2]
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new?assignees=&labels=Type%3A+bug&template=bug_report.yaml
Rok
