+1 On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:42 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Given that the C++ and Java components are in separate PRs, would it be > > acceptable to add after the initial merge? > > > OK by me. We could also create a branch to merge the PRs add the > integration tests, and then merge all at once. > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:07 AM Kyle Porter <ky...@bitquilltech.com> > wrote: > > > Given that the C++ and Java components are in separate PRs, would it be > > acceptable to add after the initial merge? > > > > *Kyle Porter* > > CEO > > Bit Quill Technologies Inc. > > Office: +1.778.331.3355 | Direct: +1.604.441.7318 | > ky...@bitquilltech.com > > https://www.bitquill.com > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > > may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not > the > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > > all copies of the original message. Thank you. > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 2:03 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > There is not an integration test. Do we want to require this? > >> > >> It would be nice, I'm -0.5 vote without one. So if enough PMC members > >> want to forgo the integration test the vote can still pass. > >> > >> > >> > >> > Is cross language testing something that's usually done? > >> > >> Yes. One of the value propositions of Arrow is the cross-language > >> support. The community agreed to specification changes (and I assumed > >> this > >> covers new specifications) need to have reference implementations in > >> C++/Java with integration testing between the two. > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 5:21 AM Kyle Porter <ky...@bitquilltech.com > >> .invalid> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > The team initially developed the C++ client against the Java server, > and > >> > have done some cross language testing. It wasn't exhaustive or > >> methodical > >> > in nature, however. Is cross language testing something that's usually > >> > done? > >> > > >> > On Wed., Dec. 8, 2021, 9:18 a.m. David Li, <lidav...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > There is not an integration test. Do we want to require this? > >> > > > >> > > Also CC @Kyle, in case your team has done such testing. > >> > > > >> > > It looks like Flight itself did not have a test for a few versions > >> after > >> > > it was initially implemented. > >> > > > >> > > -David > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021, at 23:19, Micah Kornfield wrote: > >> > > > Is there an integration test between the two languages? > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 1:35 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hello, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Kyle Porter, Rafael Telles, Ryan Nicholson, et. al. have > proposed > >> > > adding > >> > > > > Arrow Flight SQL, an experimental protocol for interacting with > >> SQL > >> > > > > databases over Arrow Flight [1], as explained in a previous ML > >> > > discussion > >> > > > > [2] and in a design document [3]. The purpose of Flight SQL is > to > >> > allow > >> > > > > clients and SQL database servers to communicate (execute > queries, > >> > list > >> > > > > tables, create prepared statements, etc.) using Arrow and Arrow > >> > > Flight, by > >> > > > > defining how to use Flight RPC methods, as well as message > >> payloads > >> > to > >> > > use > >> > > > > with those methods. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The new protocol definitions can be found at [4]. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > They have provided pull requests implementing the server and > >> client > >> > > > > protocol in C++ [5] and Java [6] which can be merged after this > >> > > addition is > >> > > > > approved. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Please vote whether to accept this addition. The vote will be > open > >> > for > >> > > at > >> > > > > least 72 hours. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [1]: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/Flight.html > >> > > > > [2]: > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/s08b20ty756qq10zybd9qr0mm4jhmz93 > >> > > > > [3]: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WQz32bDF06GgMdEYyzhakqUigBZkALFwDF2y1x3DTAI/edit?usp=sharing > >> > > > > Note that the protocol definitions in the design document are > out > >> of > >> > > date; > >> > > > > the canonical reference is in the pull requests. > >> > > > > [4]: > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/72ce72ba855909052f7dfb898105b419697157c8/format/FlightSql.proto > >> > > > > [5]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11507 > >> > > > > [6]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10906 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > David > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > -- Thanks and regards, Ravindra.
