The issue is now tracked in github [1] Thanks, Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/948 On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:54 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > @Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> > > > I did run into a small issue with the release verification script > (which I > > ran from the tarball in [2]). After the dry run publishing the arrow > crate > > it moved on to attempt to dry-run publish arrow-flight, which of course > is > > not possible and it failed with the errors below. > > That was an issue with an older version of the validation script (fixed in > [1]) -- perhaps you were using an old version? > > Andrew > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/882 > > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:09 PM Neal Richardson < > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Ran the verification script on aarch64-apple-darwin. >> >> Neal >> >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:12 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > I did run into a small issue with the release verification script >> (which I >> > ran from the tarball in [2]). After the dry run publishing the arrow >> crate >> > it moved on to attempt to dry-run publish arrow-flight, which of course >> is >> > not possible and it failed with the errors below. >> > >> > Uploading arrow v6.2.0 >> > (/tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow) >> > warning: aborting upload due to dry run >> > + popd >> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0 /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK >> > + pushd arrow-flight >> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow-flight >> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0 /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK >> > + cargo publish --dry-run >> > Updating crates.io index >> > Packaging arrow-flight v6.2.0 >> > (/tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow-flight) >> > error: failed to prepare local package for uploading >> > >> > Caused by: >> > failed to select a version for the requirement `arrow = "^6.2.0"` >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:24 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > I know these emails feel somewhat automated and are easy to ignore, >> but I >> > > think the Apache process overhead is worth the effort for several >> > reasons. >> > > Thank you for taking the time if you have it to keep the releases >> > flowing. >> > > >> > > With that preamble aside, I would like to propose a release of Apache >> > Arrow >> > > Rust Implementation, version 6.2.0. >> > > >> > > This release candidate is based on commit: >> > > 311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc [1] >> > > >> > > The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. >> > > >> > > The changelog is located at [3]. >> > > >> > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >> > > and vote on the release. There is a script [4] that automates some of >> > > the verification. >> > > >> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > > >> > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust >> > > [ ] +0 >> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... >> > > >> > > [1]: >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc >> > > [2]: >> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0-rc1 >> > > [3]: >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc/CHANGELOG.md >> > > [4]: >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> > > >> > >> >
