@Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>

>  I did run into a small issue with the release verification script (which
I
> ran from the tarball in [2]). After the dry run publishing the arrow crate
> it moved on to attempt to dry-run publish arrow-flight, which of course is
> not possible and it failed with the errors below.

That was an issue with an older version of the validation script (fixed in
[1]) -- perhaps you were using an old version?

Andrew

[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/882


On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 12:09 PM Neal Richardson <
neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Ran the verification script on aarch64-apple-darwin.
>
> Neal
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 9:12 AM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I did run into a small issue with the release verification script (which
> I
> > ran from the tarball in [2]). After the dry run publishing the arrow
> crate
> > it moved on to attempt to dry-run publish arrow-flight, which of course
> is
> > not possible and it failed with the errors below.
> >
> >    Uploading arrow v6.2.0
> > (/tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow)
> > warning: aborting upload due to dry run
> > + popd
> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0 /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK
> > + pushd arrow-flight
> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow-flight
> > /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0 /tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK
> > + cargo publish --dry-run
> >     Updating crates.io index
> >    Packaging arrow-flight v6.2.0
> > (/tmp/arrow-6.2.0.NiyYK/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0/arrow-flight)
> > error: failed to prepare local package for uploading
> >
> > Caused by:
> >   failed to select a version for the requirement `arrow = "^6.2.0"`
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:24 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I know these emails feel somewhat automated and are easy to ignore,
> but I
> > > think the Apache process overhead is worth the effort for several
> > reasons.
> > > Thank you for taking the time if you have it to keep the releases
> > flowing.
> > >
> > > With that preamble aside, I would like to propose a release of Apache
> > Arrow
> > > Rust Implementation, version 6.2.0.
> > >
> > > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > > 311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc [1]
> > >
> > > The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
> > >
> > > The changelog is located at [3].
> > >
> > > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> > > and vote on the release. There is a script [4] that automates some of
> > > the verification.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust  because...
> > >
> > > [1]:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc
> > > [2]:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-6.2.0-rc1
> > > [3]:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/311d59f2e9f541938b9fcb7c0a8b800a893437dc/CHANGELOG.md
> > > [4]:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to