OK, sounds good. I'll send a PR out soon for updating the messaging and we can see what it does to for contacts.
Thanks, Micah On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:54 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Would the experiment be removing the guidance to use > > user@? > > How about "you can use here or users@" or something? > > > What do you think the success metrics would be? > > The number of reported questions and the number of resolved > them? I think that people who vote +1 have better ideas. It > seems that they have their success stories with GitHub > issues/discussions. > > > Thanks, > -- > kou > > In <cak7z5t-htlgcifrgaqmwy5qnvtt26g6jn5kgs3-wuyjw7cd...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate user@ in favor for github issues/discussions" > on Thu, 7 Oct 2021 20:06:34 -0700, > Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, I think we can keep the both active. Would the experiment be > > removing the guidance to use user@? What do you think the success > metrics > > would be? > > > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 8:14 AM Aldrin <akmon...@ucsc.edu.invalid> wrote: > > > >> > > >> > How about trying GitHub issues and/or discussion in a > >> > specified period without deprecating user@? e.g. between > >> > 6.0.0 release and 7.0.0 release. > >> > >> > >> Oooh, I like this idea. > >> > >> > >> Aldrin Montana > >> Computer Science PhD Student > >> UC Santa Cruz > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 7:11 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > How about trying GitHub issues and/or discussion in a > >> > specified period without deprecating user@? e.g. between > >> > 6.0.0 release and 7.0.0 release. > >> > > >> > If we can see significant improvements in the period, we can > >> > discuss this again. > >> > > >> > In my opinion, I want to disable GitHub issues entirely by > >> > .asf.yaml. It's confusing to have multiple issue tracking > >> > systems within the same project. > >> > > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > -- > >> > kou > >> > > >> > In <CAK7Z5T-CX8LYSaxy7H-At9QRq= > kgwafevtqzxn5yfgjf02y...@mail.gmail.com> > >> > "[DISCUSS] Deprecate user@ in favor for github issues/discussions" > on > >> > Wed, 29 Sep 2021 11:16:07 -0700, > >> > Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > We discussed briefly on the sync this morning, but I was wondering > what > >> > > people thought about removing the user@ mailing list in favor of > >> either > >> > > Github issues or discussions. We can try to mirror issues to an > >> > > appropriate mailing list if archiving for posterity. > >> > > > >> > > Off the top of my head here are some pros/cons to approaches: > >> > > > >> > > Pros: > >> > > - Github focuses on SEO which makes answers to one-off questions > easier > >> > to > >> > > find. > >> > > - Github issues seem to have roughly the same traffic as the user@ > >> > > mailing. It would likely have more if we didn't steer people to > user@ > >> . > >> > > > >> > > Cons: > >> > > - This decentralizes user issues across the Arrow repos. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > - This is NOT a proposal to use github issues in place of JIRA (for > the > >> > > languages that are currently using JIRA). > >> > > - This is NOT a proposal to make any modification to the dev@ > mailing > >> > list > >> > > (I think centralization here is important). > >> > > > >> > > Thoughts? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Micah > >> > > >> >
