New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00
UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in
joining convenience.
On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote:
16 UTC works for me too.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf <zied.boufa...@gmail.com> wrote:
HI everyone,
Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related to
internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help
newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to
grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute.
I would vote for 16:00 UTC.
Best
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> wrote:
I would also vote for 16:00 UTC.
Remi
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen <henry.yijies...@gmail.com>
wrote:
4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D
On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote:
I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC)
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
wrote:
It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at
least
a few.
I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this.
Previously
the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time,
which I
realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia.
Could people please respond with their preference:
A) 4:00 UTC
A) 10:00 UTC
B) 16:00 UTC
D) 22:00 UTC
Thanks,
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen <
henry.yijies...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I have received a lot of great help since I started working on
DataFusion.
It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with
community
members "face to face".
Best,
Yijie
On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote:
I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to
face"
and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any
way I
can :)
--
QP
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at
least
occasionally.
I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in
more
*informal
*discussions could help us understand each other better in our
asynchronous
work (design documents, issues, PRs).
I also agree that no decision should be taken during these
calls. An
interesting format could be that each time, one or two
participants,
on a
volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work
on/around
Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it,
maybe
their
overall vision of what they would like the project to become...
Remi
Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb <
al...@influxdata.com>
a
écrit :
A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we
stopped
the
Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the
topic).
I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls
I think a call could be valuable to:
1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other
contributors
we
are
working with
2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives
from
different
stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed
Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some
in
person
discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider
splits
[3].
As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no
decisions
are
made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on
this
mailing
list or in github issues / google docs.
Andrew
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E
[2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950
[3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009
