I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. Remi
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen <henry.yijies...@gmail.com> wrote: > 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > > On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > > I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> > wrote: > > > > > It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing at > least > > > a few. > > > > > > I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > Previously > > > the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, which I > > > realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > > > > > > Could people please respond with their preference: > > > A) 4:00 UTC > > > A) 10:00 UTC > > > B) 16:00 UTC > > > D) 22:00 UTC > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen <henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > > > DataFusion. > > > > It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > community > > > > members "face to face". > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Yijie > > > > > > > > On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > > > > > I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > face" > > > > > and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > way I > > > > > can :) > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > QP > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at least > > > > > > occasionally. > > > > > > > > > > > > I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in more > > > > *informal > > > > > > *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > > > > asynchronous > > > > > > work (design documents, issues, PRs). > > > > > > > > > > > > I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > calls. An > > > > > > interesting format could be that each time, one or two > participants, > > > > on a > > > > > > volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > > > on/around > > > > > > Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > maybe > > > > their > > > > > > overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > > > > > > > > > > > > Remi > > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > > > stopped > > > > the > > > > > > > Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > > > topic). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think a call could be valuable to: > > > > > > > 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other contributors > we > > > are > > > > > > > working with > > > > > > > 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > from > > > > different > > > > > > > stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > in > > > > person > > > > > > > discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > splits > > > > [3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > decisions > > > > are > > > > > > > made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > this > > > > mailing > > > > > > > list or in github issues / google docs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
