This VOTE is closed (superseded by proposed RC2) -- thank you for your patience
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:12 PM Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: > > The tarball file name includes "-a5dd428f5". Is it intentional? It seems > that we don't need it because we have version number in file name such as > "-4.1.0". > > It was intentional as a way to > 1. Distinguish release candidates rather than using a manually assigned > `rcX` tag > 2. Tell from what git sha the code was exported. > > However, given the confusion this difference has caused, I now feel using > a manually assigned name is better and more consistent with the rest of > Arrow and I will do that going forward with subsequent release candidates. > > > File names in .sha256 and .sha512 use absolute path > > I will fix this. Thank you for pointing this out. > > I will generate a new RC shortly > > Andrew > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:28 PM Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +0 >> >> (I removed "Subject: " from Subject.) >> >> I could verify signature and checksums. I didn't run the >> unit tests. >> >> The tarball file name includes "-a5dd428f5". Is it >> intentional? It seems that we don't need it because we have >> version number in file name such as "-4.1.0". >> >> File names in .sha256 and .sha512 use absolute path: >> >> * >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha256 >> * >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha512 >> >> Can we use only base name like >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-4.0.0-rc3/apache-arrow-4.0.0.tar.gz.sha256 >> ? Then we can use sha{256,512}sum's --check option: >> >> sha256sum --check apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha256 >> sha512sum --check apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha512 >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In <cafhtnrzj2rrdbq_1jip21-pamm_hpqmqfszv9yfbzyj+-vw...@mail.gmail.com> >> "Subject: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow 4.1.0" on Tue, 18 May 2021 >> 16:12:59 -0400, >> Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, >> > version 4.1.0. >> > >> > This release candidate is based on commit: >> > a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4 [1] >> > >> > The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. >> > The changelog is located at [3]. >> > >> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >> > and vote on the release. >> > >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > >> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... >> > >> > Notes: >> > * Huge thanks to Jorge and Krisztián for helping me navigate the >> byzantine >> > arcane arts of gpg keys. >> > * The tarball was created via the following commands with the code at >> [4]: >> > >> > git fetch apache >> > git tag 4.1.0 apache/active_release >> > git push apache 4.1.0 >> > ./dev/release/create-tarball.sh 4.1.0 >> > >> > We can shorten the voting period for subsequent releases, perhaps. For >> now >> > I am going with the tried and true timeframe :) >> > >> > Thanks again, >> > Andrew >> > >> > [1]: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4 >> > [2]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0 >> > [3]: >> > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4/CHANGELOG.md >> > [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/299/files >> >
