+0

(I removed "Subject: " from Subject.)

I could verify signature and checksums. I didn't run the
unit tests.

The tarball file name includes "-a5dd428f5". Is it
intentional? It seems that we don't need it because we have
version number in file name such as "-4.1.0".

File names in .sha256 and .sha512 use absolute path:

* 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha256
* 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha512

Can we use only base name like
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-4.0.0-rc3/apache-arrow-4.0.0.tar.gz.sha256
? Then we can use sha{256,512}sum's --check option:

sha256sum --check apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha256
sha512sum --check apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0-a5dd428f5.tar.gz.sha512


Thanks,
-- 
kou

In <cafhtnrzj2rrdbq_1jip21-pamm_hpqmqfszv9yfbzyj+-vw...@mail.gmail.com>
  "Subject: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow 4.1.0" on Tue, 18 May 2021 
16:12:59 -0400,
  Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:

> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
> version 4.1.0.
> 
> This release candidate is based on commit:
> a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4 [1]
> 
> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
> The changelog is located at [3].
> 
> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> and vote on the release.
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust  because...
> 
> Notes:
> * Huge thanks to Jorge and KrisztiƔn for helping me navigate the byzantine
> arcane arts of  gpg keys.
> * The tarball was created via the following commands with the code at [4]:
> 
> git fetch apache
> git tag 4.1.0 apache/active_release
> git push apache 4.1.0
>  ./dev/release/create-tarball.sh 4.1.0
> 
> We can shorten the voting period for subsequent releases, perhaps. For now
> I am going with the tried and true timeframe :)
> 
> Thanks again,
> Andrew
> 
> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4
> [2]: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-4.1.0
> [3]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/a5dd428f57e62db20a945e8b1895de91405958c4/CHANGELOG.md
> [4]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/299/files

Reply via email to