I had an action from the last call to create a Google doc for us to collaborate on for a blog post announcing 3.0.0. Here is the document. I didn't get a chance to actually fill out much but hopefully, we can all contribute to this.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HfdmVE9iQcYlWyfk68BN2PcIjAAhRFpuPLsZW6ffy3Y/edit?usp=sharing On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:27 AM Jorge Cardoso Leitão < jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot for driving this, Andrew. > > I agree with what both of you wrote here :) > > Best, > Jorge > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:06 PM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Great topics Andrew, to my knowledge nothing has been decided on these > > topics. > > > > We also agreed last time that it would be nice to go round the table so > > that each of us has an opportunity to present briefly its use case for > the > > Rust Arrow implementation. > > > > Remi > > > > Le dim. 24 janv. 2021 à 13:16, Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> a > écrit > > : > > > > > I would like to propose two items for discussion at the Rust sync up > > > meeting on Wednesday, or comment via email if you would prefer: > > > > > > *Item 1: API Backwards compatibility expectations* > > > What, if any, expectations should users of the Rust Arrow API have > > > regarding having about needing to change their code when upgrading > arrow? > > > Should different parts of the library (eg. Arrow vs DataFusion, or > > certain > > > Arrow modules) have different expectations? > > > > > > *Item 2: What are the expectations for merging a PR?* > > > Do we have (or want to have) a more formal set of criteria for merging > > PRs? > > > For example, Is a single PR approval enough? Is there any requirement > on > > > approvals (e.g. from a committer?) Is there some minimum time between > > > approval and merge so others can comment, are there different people > who > > > should review / approve different parts of the code? > > > > > > I apologize if this is already written down somewhere, but I could not > > find > > > it. > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > >
