Great topics Andrew, to my knowledge nothing has been decided on these topics.
We also agreed last time that it would be nice to go round the table so that each of us has an opportunity to present briefly its use case for the Rust Arrow implementation. Remi Le dim. 24 janv. 2021 à 13:16, Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> a écrit : > I would like to propose two items for discussion at the Rust sync up > meeting on Wednesday, or comment via email if you would prefer: > > *Item 1: API Backwards compatibility expectations* > What, if any, expectations should users of the Rust Arrow API have > regarding having about needing to change their code when upgrading arrow? > Should different parts of the library (eg. Arrow vs DataFusion, or certain > Arrow modules) have different expectations? > > *Item 2: What are the expectations for merging a PR?* > Do we have (or want to have) a more formal set of criteria for merging PRs? > For example, Is a single PR approval enough? Is there any requirement on > approvals (e.g. from a committer?) Is there some minimum time between > approval and merge so others can comment, are there different people who > should review / approve different parts of the code? > > I apologize if this is already written down somewhere, but I could not find > it. > > Andrew >
