Anyone have an opinion on this?  Personally, I'm leaning on keeping the
existing API compatibility, but I don't feel too strongly about it.

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 7:39 PM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Yongbo Zhang,
> Opened up a pull request to have DateMilliVector return a LocalDate
> instead of a LocalDateTime object.
>
> Do people have opinions if this breaking change is worth the correctness?
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5315
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 4:14 PM Yongbo Zhang <zhangyongbo0...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Summary: [Java] DateMilliVector.getObject() should return a LocalDate,
>> not a LocalDateTime
>> Key: ARROW-1984
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1984
>> Pull Request: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5315
>> Project: Apache Arrow
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: Java
>> Reporter: Vanco Buca
>> Assignee: Yongbo Zhang
>> Fix For: 0.15.0
>>
>> This is an API breaking change therefore we may want to discuss about it
>> before merging any PRs in.
>>
>

Reply via email to