Thanks Paul! This seems to have done the trick. I will get the RC out later this evening
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:50 PM, Paul Taylor <ptay...@apache.org> wrote: > This should fix it: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1751 > <https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1751> > >> On Mar 14, 2018, at 6:42 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Last item https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2312 >> >> I can start the release vote as soon as we have the release >> verification script working again >> >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> OK, patch is up for ARROW-2307: >>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1747. Once that is reviewed and >>> merged I will start the release vote >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'm going to have a look at ARROW-2307 to see if it's an easy fix. If >>>> not, I will go ahead with the RC >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote: >>>>> The mentioned bugfixes were merged and I also tested the >>>>> Arrow<->Parquet-cpp as well as the Arrow<->Dask(parquet) integration. >>>>> Both seem to work fine. From my side it looks like we're ready to make an >>>>> RC. >>>>> >>>>> Uwe >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018, at 5:07 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: >>>>>> I fixed these bugs >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1742 >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1743 >>>>>> >>>>>> As soon as these patches go in, we can cut the RC0. I can do this as >>>>>> soon as tomorrow (Wednesday) morning >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> I found 2 bugs -- ARROW-2304 and ARROW-2306 -- while doing some final >>>>>>> testing of master (stuff we haven't been testing in CI -- we _really_ >>>>>>> need to set up nightly CI jobs for more time consuming tests, like >>>>>>> HDFS, that we want to test periodically but perhaps not on every >>>>>>> commit). I'm going to see if these are easy to fix >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:21 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> I fixed ARROW-2227 in https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/1740, so if >>>>>>>> someone could review that would be great. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am going to make sure the C++/Python HDFS tests run locally, then >>>>>>>> after the patch above is merged we should be good to make the RC. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Note to other onlookers -- please feel free to keep writing new >>>>>>>> patches not mentioned here. They may just have to go in to the next >>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Things are looking pretty good. I'm waiting on a build for ARROW-1643 >>>>>>>>> to go in, and there's a last blocker bug (ARROW-2227) that we ought to >>>>>>>>> try to fix tomorrow before cutting the RC. I can start the vote after >>>>>>>>> that if nothing else comes up >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I created ARROW-2300 in the course of trying to test ARROW-1643. I >>>>>>>>> have an alternative way to run the HDFS tests (since we aren't running >>>>>>>>> them in Travis CI) so most likely I will try out the HDFS tests and >>>>>>>>> then move ARROW-2300 to the next release milestone. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> I've done a pass over the remaining JIRAs -- I think we're going to >>>>>>>>>> need at least another full day to get things buttoned up, so I would >>>>>>>>>> say we're looking at an RC on Tuesday. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In progress: >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-1425: Patch up, needs some editing, may be moved to 0.10.0 >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2282: Patch up, needs some test cases >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-1974: Patch in review in apache/parquet-cpp -- may want to >>>>>>>>>> move this JIRA to the Parquet project >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2122: Patch to be reviewed >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2135: Patch to be merged >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> TODO >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2082: Parquet segfault <- to be investigated, may be moved >>>>>>>>>> to 0.10.0 >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2118: Fix rough edge with reading length-0 files >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2227: Bug with creating chunked arrays in Table.from_pandas >>>>>>>>>> - ARROW-2292: Deprecation / renaming a Python method >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Out of the two items in TODO, ARROW-2118 and ARROW-2292 are small >>>>>>>>>> matters, so I will take care of them. ARROW-2227 may not be fixable >>>>>>>>>> within ~1 day but it would be useful to have a diagnosis in case the >>>>>>>>>> fix is easy -- multiple users hit this bug. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> kou >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>>> <cajpuwmbsxxw9-8vrj3xwud_p3y7sosdmc6xc53pkrjusewm...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>> "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next week" >>>>>>>>>>> on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 20:44:14 -0500, >>>>>>>>>>> Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> hi Kou -- yes, I think this is a good idea. It will require a >>>>>>>>>>>> little >>>>>>>>>>>> bit of work to be able to produce a viable standalone source >>>>>>>>>>>> tarball. >>>>>>>>>>>> Between Uwe, Phillip, Antoine, and I, we should be able to come up >>>>>>>>>>>> with a plan to do this >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - Wes >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we try adding PyArrow source package to PyPI at the >>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.9.0? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to install PyArrow with Arrow C++ installed by .deb >>>>>>>>>>>>> or .rpm. I want to use both Red Arrow (Ruby bindings) and >>>>>>>>>>>>> PyArrow in the same process via PyCall (Ruby library >>>>>>>>>>>>> to integrate with Python). In the case, I need to use the >>>>>>>>>>>>> same Arrow C++ in both Red Arrow and PyArrow. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, there are only binary packages for PyArrow at >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyarrow . If there is a source >>>>>>>>>>>>> package for PyArrow at PyPI, I can install PyArrow with >>>>>>>>>>>>> Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm by "pip --no-binary >>>>>>>>>>>>> pyarrow". >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Red Arrow can also use Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> kou >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In >>>>>>>>>>>>> <cakhw1aqgv7sn70jewe5qmw00yevx_xg_zjinywgbo00+c4k...@mail.gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next >>>>>>>>>>>>> week" on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:25:32 -0800, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I plan to get RC out over the weekend or early Monday. Is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have 6 items in progress -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707#release-report-tab-body. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do people feel about completing these JIRAs by tomorrow? I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>> completely fine with deferring the RC to early next week >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Mon/Tue/Wed) if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> necessary. Just looking for consensus. Also, I suggest that we >>>>>>>>>>>>>> defer the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones with TODO status. I will do it later today unless I hear >>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if anyone else is interested in collaborating >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> post-release tasks. As per >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/RELEASE_MANAGEMENT.md, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> following are the high level post-release tasks. Please let me >>>>>>>>>>>>>> know if you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to take up something. I have written my name against >>>>>>>>>>>>>> some of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating the Arrow Website (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Uploading release artifacts to SVN -- looks like PMC karma >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is needed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Announcing release (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating website with new API documentation (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating conda packages for C++ and Python (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Updating Java Maven artifacts in Maven central (Sidd) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Release blog post >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If anything is missing, please add to the above list. It will be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> helpful >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for tracking. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Wes McKinney >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hey Sidd, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Python backlog is still in pretty rough shape. I'd like to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can make an RC by Friday but if not we can defer to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Monday/Tuesday >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the following week (3/12 or 13). I will trim as much as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible out >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the current backlog to get things down to the essential >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Wes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Siddharth Teotia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2018 6:24 PM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmck...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sidd, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think we have too many bugs to make an RC this coming week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suggest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defer to the following week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2018 7:09 PM, "Siddharth Teotia" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We currently have 10 issues in progress and PRs are available >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 8 of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them. In interest of getting a release candidate next week, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people to review PRs as soon as they can to help make progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and close >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out as many JIRAs as we can. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are 32 issues in TODO list and 25 of them are not yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> planning to defer some of the unassigned ones later today or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow. It >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be good to soon grab/assign the issues that people want >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be fixed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for 0.9.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is the link to backlog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sidd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
