I've done a pass over the remaining JIRAs -- I think we're going to need at least another full day to get things buttoned up, so I would say we're looking at an RC on Tuesday.
In progress: - ARROW-1425: Patch up, needs some editing, may be moved to 0.10.0 - ARROW-2282: Patch up, needs some test cases - ARROW-1974: Patch in review in apache/parquet-cpp -- may want to move this JIRA to the Parquet project - ARROW-2122: Patch to be reviewed - ARROW-2135: Patch to be merged TODO - ARROW-2082: Parquet segfault <- to be investigated, may be moved to 0.10.0 - ARROW-2118: Fix rough edge with reading length-0 files - ARROW-2227: Bug with creating chunked arrays in Table.from_pandas - ARROW-2292: Deprecation / renaming a Python method Out of the two items in TODO, ARROW-2118 and ARROW-2292 are small matters, so I will take care of them. ARROW-2227 may not be fixable within ~1 day but it would be useful to have a diagnosis in case the fix is easy -- multiple users hit this bug. Thanks, Wes On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > -- > kou > > In <cajpuwmbsxxw9-8vrj3xwud_p3y7sosdmc6xc53pkrjusewm...@mail.gmail.com> > "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next week" on Thu, > 8 Mar 2018 20:44:14 -0500, > Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi Kou -- yes, I think this is a good idea. It will require a little >> bit of work to be able to produce a viable standalone source tarball. >> Between Uwe, Phillip, Antoine, and I, we should be able to come up >> with a plan to do this >> >> - Wes >> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:33 PM, Kouhei Sutou <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>> >>> Can we try adding PyArrow source package to PyPI at the >>> 0.9.0? >>> >>> I want to install PyArrow with Arrow C++ installed by .deb >>> or .rpm. I want to use both Red Arrow (Ruby bindings) and >>> PyArrow in the same process via PyCall (Ruby library >>> to integrate with Python). In the case, I need to use the >>> same Arrow C++ in both Red Arrow and PyArrow. >>> >>> Now, there are only binary packages for PyArrow at >>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyarrow . If there is a source >>> package for PyArrow at PyPI, I can install PyArrow with >>> Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm by "pip --no-binary >>> pyarrow". >>> >>> Red Arrow can also use Arrow C++ installed by .deb or .rpm. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> kou >>> >>> In <cakhw1aqgv7sn70jewe5qmw00yevx_xg_zjinywgbo00+c4k...@mail.gmail.com> >>> "Re: Working towards getting 0.9.0 release candidate up next week" on >>> Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:25:32 -0800, >>> Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I plan to get RC out over the weekend or early Monday. Is that fine with >>>> everybody? >>>> >>>> We have 6 items in progress -- >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707#release-report-tab-body. >>>> How do people feel about completing these JIRAs by tomorrow? I am >>>> completely fine with deferring the RC to early next week (Mon/Tue/Wed) if >>>> necessary. Just looking for consensus. Also, I suggest that we defer the >>>> ones with TODO status. I will do it later today unless I hear otherwise. >>>> >>>> I was wondering if anyone else is interested in collaborating for the >>>> post-release tasks. As per >>>> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/RELEASE_MANAGEMENT.md, >>>> following are the high level post-release tasks. Please let me know if you >>>> would like to take up something. I have written my name against some of >>>> them. >>>> >>>> >>>> - Updating the Arrow Website (Sidd) >>>> - Uploading release artifacts to SVN -- looks like PMC karma is needed >>>> to do this >>>> - Announcing release (Sidd) >>>> - Updating website with new API documentation (Sidd) >>>> - Updating pip packages for C++ and Python >>>> - Updating conda packages for C++ and Python (Sidd) >>>> - Updating Java Maven artifacts in Maven central (Sidd) >>>> - Release blog post >>>> >>>> If anything is missing, please add to the above list. It will be helpful >>>> for tracking. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sidd >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> hey Sidd, >>>>> >>>>> The Python backlog is still in pretty rough shape. I'd like to see if >>>>> we can make an RC by Friday but if not we can defer to Monday/Tuesday >>>>> the following week (3/12 or 13). I will trim as much as possible out >>>>> of the current backlog to get things down to the essential >>>>> >>>>> - Wes >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Siddharth Teotia <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > Sounds good. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks >>>>> > Sidd >>>>> > >>>>> > On Feb 24, 2018 6:24 PM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi Sidd, >>>>> > >>>>> > I think we have too many bugs to make an RC this coming week. I suggest >>>>> we >>>>> > defer to the following week. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks >>>>> > Wes >>>>> > >>>>> > On Feb 24, 2018 7:09 PM, "Siddharth Teotia" <siddha...@dremio.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi All, >>>>> > >>>>> > We currently have 10 issues in progress and PRs are available for 8 of >>>>> > them. In interest of getting a release candidate next week, I would >>>>> request >>>>> > people to review PRs as soon as they can to help make progress and close >>>>> > out as many JIRAs as we can. >>>>> > >>>>> > There are 32 issues in TODO list and 25 of them are not yet assigned. I >>>>> am >>>>> > planning to defer some of the unassigned ones later today or tomorrow. >>>>> > It >>>>> > would be good to soon grab/assign the issues that people want to be >>>>> > fixed >>>>> > for 0.9.0. >>>>> > >>>>> > Here is the link to backlog: >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12341707 >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks, >>>>> > Sidd >>>>>
